SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
LAKINDRA SAHNI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./25812/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25812 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali

======================================================

Lakindra Sahni S/o Sri Ram Sanehi Sahni R/o village- Etbarpur, P.S.- Lalganj,

District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Nisha Kumari D/o Shravan Sharma R/o village- Etbarpur, P.S.- Lalganj,

District- Vaishali (Informant)

... ... Opposite Parties

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sarwan Kumar, Senior Advocate

Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL ORDER

2

16-08-2022

Heard Mr. Sarwan Kumar, learned Senior Counsel

for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the

office, be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with

Lalganj P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019 under sections 341, 323, 354,

506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 and 12 of the

POCSO Act.

As per the prosecution story, when the victim girl

was returning home along with her younger brother and grand-

mother, it is alleged that accused-petitioner herein who was in

drunken condition, pushed the victim girl on the ground and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25812 of 2022(2) dt.16-08-2022

2/3

acted indecently. As the brother and the grand-mother raised

‘hulla’, he fled away from the place. Later, the informant’s

family members were threatened that in case they took up the

matter, dire consequences will follow.

The learned Senior Counsel submits with the help

of para-10 of the bail application that post FIR, no progress have

taken place and three years later on 21.3.2022, statement of the

victim girl was recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in

which she exaggerated the matter saying that she was molested

too on the basis of thereof, the petitioner was arrested on the

same day. He submits that neither he was absconding nor the

police took steps for his arrest and as such the delay in his

judicial custody for three years is not deliberate. He lastly

submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also that

the charge-sheet stands submitted and the petitioner has no

criminal antecedent as also that he is in custody since 21.3.2022,

this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

District Judge VI cum Exclusive Special Court POSCO,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25812 of 2022(2) dt.16-08-2022

3/3

Vaishali, in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 26 of 2019

subject to the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailors should be the family members of

the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show

his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of

bail by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) he shall in no way try to induce or promise or

threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which

the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his

bail bonds.

With the aforesaid observations, the bail

application is allowed.

Ravi/-

(Rajiv Roy, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top