SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
BIMAL KISHORE YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./26048/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26048 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2021 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur

======================================================

Bimal Kishore Yadav Son of Late Chaturbhuj Yadav Resident of Village -

Block colony, Sultanganj, P.s.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL ORDER

2

05-08-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State in Virtual Court Proceeding.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the

office, be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with

Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 284 of 2021 under section 25(1-b)a, 26

& 35 of the Arms Act.

As per the allegation in the FIR, the police upon

information that the petitioner herein has kept illegal arms in his

house, raided the same and upon search it has been alleged that

two country made pistols were recovered/seized whereas from

the pocket of the petitioner, two live cartridges were also

recovered/seized and no documents in support of the said arms

were produced. In the meanwhile, the son of the petitioner also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26048 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022

2/3

reached there but he failed to give satisfactory answer as also to

produce any documents about the aforesaid seizure.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has

been implicated in this case due to political rivalry as he was the

‘Sarpanch’ of the area. He further submits that opposite parties

with whom he had political issue in connivance with the police

has framed him in this case for which he has suffered a lot by

being in jail since 20.12.2021 (as stated in para-16 of the bail

application).

Considering the aforesaid facts as also that he is in

custody since 20.12.2021 and charge-sheet stands submitted,

this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-1st, Bhagalpur,

in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 284 of 2021

corresponding to G.R. No. 5304 of 2021 subject to the

following conditions:

(i) one of the bailors should be the family members of

the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show

his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26048 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022

3/3

before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of

bail by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

Ravi/-

(Rajiv Roy, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top