HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Shankar Kumar Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
CWJC 21823/2012
['Mithilesh Kumar Singh', 'NIRBHAY K SINGH', '', 'Md Shahnawaz Ali']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21823 of 2012
======================================================
Shankar Kumar Mandal S/o Late Jagdish Mandal R/o Mohalla-Gullowar,
P.S.-Darbhanga Town, Distt-Darbhanga
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer,
Zila Parishad , Darbhanga
3. Zila Parishad, Darbhanga through its Chairman, Zila Parishad, Darbhanga
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kr.Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Lalan Kumar, AC to G.P.26
For Zila Parishad : Mr.Md. Shahnawaz Ali, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR
DATTA
ORAL ORDER
2
18-12-2012
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsels for the State and for the Zila Parishad, Darbhanga.
The petitioner, who retired as an Assistant in the Zila
Parishad, Darbhanga on 31.3.2012, is aggrieved on account of
non-payment of his post retiral dues like gratuity, leave
encashment, etc. So far as the claim of the petitioner regarding
difference of pay is concerned, liberty is granted to the petitioner
to take recourse to appropriate proceedings including filing
another writ petition.
Learned counsel for the Zila Parishad submits that on
account of financial stringency the Zila Parishad is making the
Patna High Court CWJC No.21823 of 2012 (2) dt.18-12-2012
2
post retiral dues in chronological order.
This Court does not find any justification in such stand
on behalf of the Zila Parishad which is the third tier of governance
according to the provisions of the Constitution and Act of the State
Legislature.
It is, accordingly, directed that the petitioner should be
paid all his admissible post retiral dues within a period of four
months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid
observations and directions.
spal/-
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)