SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha
RAMADHIN YADAV @ RAMDIN YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
/35831/2021



An accused person is entitled to bail even in a case of dowry death if there is no allegation of torture or demand of dowry against him and he has been in custody for a considerable period of time.

Headnote:

DOWRY DEATH - BAIL - SECTION 304B IPC - CO-OPERATION IN DISPOSING DEAD BODY - NO ALLEGATION OF TORTURE OR DEMAND OF DOWRY - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/201/34 of the IPC. The victim was the sister-in-law of the informant, and her husband had been demanding a motorcycle as dowry. Due to non-fulfillment of the demand, the accused persons killed the victim and tried to burn the dead body with the help of the petitioner and others.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no allegation against the petitioner of torture or demand of dowry from the victim and her family members. The only allegation against the petitioner was that he cooperated with the accused persons in disposing of the dead body of the deceased.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in the given circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the submissions made by the parties, the material on record, the nature of the allegation, the fact that the petitioner had been in custody since 22.01.2021, and the fact that the charge-sheet had already been submitted in the matter. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail.

Final Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35831 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-476 Year-2019 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani

======================================================

RAMADHIN YADAV @ RAMDIN YADAV Son of Late Sarjoo Yadav R/O

Village Dholi Tole, P.S. Jainagar, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav,

Mr. Masoom Alam, Advocates

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER

2

05-01-2022

Heard Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, Additional Public

Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

Jainagar PS Case No. 776/2019 registered for the offence

punishable under Sections 304B/201/34 of the IPC.

Marriage of sister-in-law of informant was

solemnized with co-accused, Rakesh Yadav about two years ago

and after some time, the husband of the victim started

demanding motorcycle as dowry and due to non fulfillment of

the demand, the accused persons killed the sister-in-law of the

informant and tried to burn the dead body with the help of the

petitioner and others.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is

no allegation against the petitioner of torture and demand of

dowry from the victim and her family members. Petitioner

happens to be father-in-law of elder brother-in-law (Bhainsur)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35831 of 2021(2) dt.05-01-2022

2/2

of victim. He further submits that the only allegation against the

petitioner is that he co-operated the accused persons in

disposing the dead body of the deceased. Learned counsel next

submits that petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2021 and he

resides in different village.

Regards being had to the submissions made by the

parties and taking into consideration the material on record and

the nature of allegation and the fact that petitioner is in custody

since 22.01.2021 and the charge-sheet has already been

submitted in the matter, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the

petitioner.

Accordingly, let the petitioner, RAMADHIN YADAV

@ RAMDIN YADAV be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Jainagar PS Case No.

476/2019 corresponding to CRI No. 1790/2019.

perwez

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top