HIGH COURT OF PATNA
MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM MIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. REV. 329 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.329 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2012 Thana- IMADPUR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
1.
MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM MIYAN
Son of Late Lallu Mian under the Guardian Ship of his mother Nazma
Khatoon the Natural Guardian of Appellant No. 1. Resident of village-Moap
Kalan, Moap Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara)
2.
NASIM MIYAN @ NASIM ALAM Son of Late Safi Miyan @ Safi Alam
under the Guardian Ship of his mother (Rukhshana Khatoon) Natural
Guardian of Appellan No. 2. Resident of village-Moap Kalan, Moap Buzurg,
P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara)
3.
ALAMGIR Son of Md. Anwar Ali under the Guardian Ship of his father is
the Natural Guardian namely Md. Anwar Ali. Appellants are with the
Natural Guardian of village-Moap Kalan, Moap Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur,
District-Bhojpur (Ara)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
3
22-08-2023
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.
2. The petitioners have filed the present revision application
against the order, dated 20.02.2023, passed by the learned
7th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, at Ara, in Sessions
Trial No. 145 of 2013, whereby the learned District Court
has rejected the petition of the petitioners for holding
them as juvenile.
3. It is an admitted position that the petitioners have not
moved any application for determination of their age
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.329 of 2023(3) dt.22-08-2023
2/2
before the Juvenile Justice Board, Purnea, under Section
94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2015.
4. Accordingly, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to
approach the Juvenile Justice Board, Purnea, for
determination of their age.
5. Permission is granted.
6. This application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the
liberty aforesaid.
Prabhakar Anand/-
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
U
√
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.