SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava
MUNNA @ MUNNILAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./30648/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30648 of 2020

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-372 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai

======================================================

MUNNA @ MUNNILAL SINGH Son of Late Nato Singh @ Ramcharitra

Singh Resident of Village - Madhurapur South Tola, P.S. - Teghra, District -

Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Brajesh Kumar Singh

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA

ORAL ORDER

3

09-02-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Teghra

P.S. Case No. 372 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 387,

302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is

innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the

petitioner happens to be a member of mob only and there is

no specific allegation attributed against him. The petitioner

is rotting in judicial custody since 27.10.2019.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer

for bail and submitted that according to the F.I.R the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30648 of 2020(3) dt.09-02-2021

2/2

petitioner along with other co-accused has opened fire

resultantly the son of the informant recieved firearm injury

as a result of which he died during course of treatment.

Moreover, the doctor found firearm injury on the person of

the deceased and has opined that the deceased died due to

haemorrhage and shock cause by firearm injury. Apart from

this case, the petitioner is also an accused in another case

which is evident from paragraph 55 of the case diary.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected.

Brajesh/-

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top