SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Smt. Kumud Sahu Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
L.P.A 1486/2016



Advocates:
['Bijoy Kant Mishra', '', 'Ashutosh Jha', 'Narendra Pandey', 'MANINDRA KISHORE SINGH- SC', '', 'Sunil Kumar alias Sharma']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1486 of 2016

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3277 of 2009

======================================================

Smt. Kumud Sahu Chaudhary W/o Sushil Kumar Chaudhary R/O 4th Floor,

Bank of india building, Sahjanand chowk, Harmu by pass Road, Ranchi

Jharkhand

... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar

2.

Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna New Secretariat, Patna

3.

Patliputra Co- Operative House Construction Society Limited, Patliputra

Colony, Patna-800013 through

4.

Board of Directors of Patliputra Co-operative House Construction Society

Limited, Patna-800013 thro

5.

The District Co- Operative Officer, Patna

6.

The Addl. Collector, Land and Order, Patna

7.

Smt. Swati pandey W/o Major Prem Singh

8.

Smt. Anvita Pradhan W/o Dr. Ajit Pradhan Both R/o 111 Patliputra Colony,

Patna-13

9.

Smt. Yamica N Pandey W/o Mr. H Ananth Narayana At-1103 Hill Orange,

Hiranandani Estate God bender Road, Patliputra Thana West Mumbai-

400607, Maharashtra

... ... Respondents

======================================================

with

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1489 of 2016

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12255 of 2007

======================================================

Smt. Kumud Chaudhary W/o Sushil Kumar Chaudhary, R/o 4th floor, Bank of

India building, Sahganand Chowk,Harmu by pass Road, Ranchi Jharkhand.

... ... Appellants

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar

2.

Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

Patliputra Co-Operative House Construction Society Limite, Patliputra

Colony, Patna-800013 through

4.

Board of Directors of Patliputra Co-Operative House Construction Society

Limited, Patna-800013 thro

5.

Smt. Swati Pandey W/o Major Prem Singh

6.

Smt. Anvita Pradhan W/o Dr. Ajit Pradhan both r/o 111 Patliputra colony.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1486 of 2016 dt.19-10-2022

2/23

Patna-13

7.

Smt. Yamica N Pandey W/o Mr. H Ananth Narayan 1103 Hill Orange

Hiranandani Estate Godbender Road, Patli Purdda Thana West Mumbai-

400607, Maharashtra

... ... Respondents

======================================================

Appearance :

(In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1486 of 2016)

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Advocate

Mr.Bijoy Kant Mishra, Advocate

Mr. Avinav Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

(In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1489 of 2016)

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Advocate

Mr.Bijoy Kant Mishra, Advocate

Mr. Avinav Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Ajay Behari Sinha, Sr. Advocate

Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh, AC to GA-8

Respondent no. 5 to 7

:

Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY)

Date : 19-10-2022

The two appeals, LPA No. 1486 of 2016 and LPA

No. 1489 of 2016 have been preferred by the sole appellant-

petitioner challenging the common order dated 24.6.2016

passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 3277 of

2009 and C.W.J.C. No. 12255 of 2007 respectively by which the

orders dated 17.7.2007/23.7.2007 passed by respondent no.2,

the Registrar, Cooperative Society, Bihar, Patna (henceforth for

short ‘the Registrar’) as also the order dated

19.11.2008/20.11.2008 passed by the respondent no.5, the

District Cooperative Officer, Patna (henceforth for short ‘the

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1486 of 2016 dt.19-10-2022

3/23

Cooperative Officer’) and the order dated 23.01.2009 passed by

the respondent no.6, Additional Collector, Law and Order, Patna

were not interfered with and the writ petitions preferred by the

appellant-petitioner was dismissed with further direction to the

concerned authorities to return the amount deposited by her

within a period of three months failing which she shall be

entitled to bank interest.

2. The matrix

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top