Advocates:
['Arun Kumar Pandey', '', 'Narendra Kumar', 'BINITA SINGH SC', '', 'RAMAKANT SHARMA L O', 'INC', 'VIGILANCE', 'Archana Palkar Khopde']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.485 of 2018

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2016 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna

======================================================

1.

Ram Sundar Choudhary and Anr S/o Late Sita Ram Choudhary , R/o

Village- Mojahidpur, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, O.P. - Dhanawahm, District-

Siwan.

2.

Awadh Bihari Choudhary S/o Late Motilal Choudhary, R/o Village-

Lakhrawn, P.S.- Muffasil Siwan, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar,

Patna.

3.

The Director Higher Education, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Vice Chancellor J.P. University, Chhapra.

5.

The Registrar, J.P. University, Chhapra.

6.

The Superintendent, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna.

7.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone Vigilance

Investigation Bureau.

... ... Respondents

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Kamal Nayan, AC to SC-28

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

2

01-08-2022

Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned senior

counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Kamal Nayan, AC to SC-28

for the State.

During pendency of this writ application the

investigation has been completed, a charge-sheet has been filed

and this Court has been informed that order taking cognizance

has already been passed by the learned court below. The charge-

sheet and the order taking cognizance are not under challenge in

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.485 of 2018(2) dt.01-08-2022

2/2

the present writ application as no petition seeking amendment

has been filed.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, learned senior

counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this

application with liberty to seek his remedy, if so advised, against

the charge-sheet and the order taking cognizance in an

appropriate application before the court of competent

jurisdiction.

Learned AC to SC-28 for the State has no objection to

such prayer of the petitioners.

This application is, thus, disposed of with liberty as

prayed for.

Rajeev/-

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)

U

Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all

concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading ‘Judicial Orders Passed During The

Pandemic Period’.