IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10014 of 2015

======================================================

Pradip Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Alakh Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Moti

Lal Lane, Sikandarpur, Post- Mirjanhat, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District-

Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Bank of India, through its Chairman Corporate Centre, State Bank

Bhawan, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai.

2.

The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West

Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

3.

The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Khanjarpur, Bhagalpur.

4.

Assistant General Manager cum Authorized Officer, State Bank of India,

RASMECC-SARK, Administrative Office Building, 3rd Floor, Khanjarpur,

Bhagalpur.

5.

The Branch Manager, Local Officer of Auction Property, RASMECC-

SARK, Administrative Office Building, 3rd Floor, Khanjarpur, Bhagalpur.

6.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Bhagalpur.

8.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur.

9.

Shankar Prasad Gupta @ Bhola Prasad Sah, Son of Late Bishwanath Sah,

resident of Mohalla- Mohaddinagar, P.S.- Mozahidpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

: Mr. Jashawir Singh Arora, Sr. Advocate along with

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC 19

For the State Bank of India : Ms. Namrata Mishra, Advocate with

Ms. Archana Jha, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH)

Date : 20-12-2022

Heard Mr. Jashawir Singh Arora, learned senior counsel

along with Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner;

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, learned SC 19 for the State and Ms. Namrata

Patna High Court CWJC No.10014 of 2015 dt.20-12-2022

2/2

Mishra, learned counsel for the State Bank of India (hereinafter

referred to as the “S.B.I.”).

2. The short point involved in the case was that the writ

petitioner despite having paid for a property brought from the

S.B.I. under auction and having paid the amount in the year 2014

had still not got possession of the said property.

3. Today learned counsel for the S.B.I. has produced

copy of the possession letter on which the parties have singed in

acknowledgment of possession being handed over to the petitioner

of the premises concerned.

4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner does not

dispute the possession.

5. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands

disposed of.

Arish/-

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

AFR/NAFR

U

T