HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh
HUMA PARWIN @ RABIYA PARBIN – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ)/2006/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2006 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2019 Thana- SC/ST District- Samastipur
======================================================
1.
Huma Parwin @ Rabiya Parbin aged about 22 years D/o Md. Jamrudin @
Md. Zamirudin @ Md. Jamiruddin, W/o Md. Mukhtar Resident of Village-
Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil, District-Samastipur.
2.
Sahin Parwin aged about 47 years W/o Md. Jamrudin @ Md. Zamiruddin @
Md. Jamiruddin Resident of Village-Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil,
District-Samastipur.
3.
Mobin Udin aged about 81 years S/o Md. Kutubuddin @ Md. Kutubudin
Resident of Village-Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil, District-Samastipur.
... ... Appellants
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Leela Devi W/o Late Julus Ram R/o Bikrampur Bande, P.S.-Mufassil,
District-Samastipur.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellants
:
Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent
:
Mr.A.G.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2
27-01-2021
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants
submits that this appeal seeking anticipatory bail has become
infructuos with respect to appellant no.3 as during pendency of
the same, appellant no.3 has been arrested.
In view of the submission of learned counsel for the
appellant, the appeal is dismissed as being infructuous with
respect to appellant no.3.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present appeal is directed against the order dated
5.3.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, Samastipur in a case
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2006 of 2020(2) dt.27-01-2021
2/3
registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (i) (r) (s) of the SC/ST Act,
whereby anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected.
Learned counsel for the appellants no.1 and 2 submits
that it is a case of cheque bounce. From perusal of the FIR it
appears that the cheques were issued by Md. Jamiruddin who
has already been granted provisional bail vide order dated
21.10.2020, passed in Cr.Appeal(SJ) No.1549/2020. Appellant
no.1 is daughter and appellant no.2 is wife of Md.Zamiruddin.
Cheques were not issued by these appellants who are ladies and
have no criminal antecedent.
Learned counsel for the state on the other hand
opposes the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the submissions and the fact that co-
accused Md. Zamiruddin has already been granted provisional
bail, appeal in respect of these two appellants who are ladies, is
allowed and the impugned order dated 5.3.2020 is set aside.
Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender by the
appellants, above named, before the court below within eight
weeks from today, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2006 of 2020(2) dt.27-01-2021
3/3
learned Additional District and Sessions Judge–I cum
Samastipur in SC/ST Police Station Case No. 17/2019, GR
No.639 of 2019.
Shashi
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
U
T