SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh
HUMA PARWIN @ RABIYA PARBIN – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ)/2006/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2006 of 2020

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2019 Thana- SC/ST District- Samastipur

======================================================

1.

Huma Parwin @ Rabiya Parbin aged about 22 years D/o Md. Jamrudin @

Md. Zamirudin @ Md. Jamiruddin, W/o Md. Mukhtar Resident of Village-

Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil, District-Samastipur.

2.

Sahin Parwin aged about 47 years W/o Md. Jamrudin @ Md. Zamiruddin @

Md. Jamiruddin Resident of Village-Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil,

District-Samastipur.

3.

Mobin Udin aged about 81 years S/o Md. Kutubuddin @ Md. Kutubudin

Resident of Village-Bikrampur Bande, P.S-Muffasil, District-Samastipur.

... ... Appellants

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Leela Devi W/o Late Julus Ram R/o Bikrampur Bande, P.S.-Mufassil,

District-Samastipur.

... ... Respondents

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellants

:

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent

:

Mr.A.G.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

ORAL ORDER

2

27-01-2021

At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants

submits that this appeal seeking anticipatory bail has become

infructuos with respect to appellant no.3 as during pendency of

the same, appellant no.3 has been arrested.

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the

appellant, the appeal is dismissed as being infructuous with

respect to appellant no.3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present appeal is directed against the order dated

5.3.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, Samastipur in a case

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2006 of 2020(2) dt.27-01-2021

2/3

registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the

Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (i) (r) (s) of the SC/ST Act,

whereby anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected.

Learned counsel for the appellants no.1 and 2 submits

that it is a case of cheque bounce. From perusal of the FIR it

appears that the cheques were issued by Md. Jamiruddin who

has already been granted provisional bail vide order dated

21.10.2020, passed in Cr.Appeal(SJ) No.1549/2020. Appellant

no.1 is daughter and appellant no.2 is wife of Md.Zamiruddin.

Cheques were not issued by these appellants who are ladies and

have no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the state on the other hand

opposes the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the submissions and the fact that co-

accused Md. Zamiruddin has already been granted provisional

bail, appeal in respect of these two appellants who are ladies, is

allowed and the impugned order dated 5.3.2020 is set aside.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender by the

appellants, above named, before the court below within eight

weeks from today, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2006 of 2020(2) dt.27-01-2021

3/3

learned Additional District and Sessions Judge–I cum

Samastipur in SC/ST Police Station Case No. 17/2019, GR

No.639 of 2019.

Shashi

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top