PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh
PANKAJ YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./43038/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43038 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2021 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria
======================================================
PANKAJ YADAV SON OF SAUDAGAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE-
CHANDPUR, P.S.- GOGRI, DISTICT- KHAGARIA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Bishweshwar Ram
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Meena Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2
29-10-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State
through virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove
the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight
weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Gogri P.S. Case
No. 137 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 30 liters wine is
recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the
petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of
tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner
has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 30
liters wine is recovered from the maize field in abandoned state. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43038 of 2021(2) dt.29-10-2021
2/2
maize field is said to be of the petitioner. Consel for the petitioner
submits that the said allegation is wrong as the maize field does not
belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered
from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no
knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of
Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is
named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender
before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from
today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act,
Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 137 of 2021,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.
A.K.V.//-
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.