HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
SULTAN ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./44497/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44497 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2020 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
SULTAN ANSARI Son of Iliyas Ansari Resident of Village - Hasna, P.s.-
Gaighat, District - Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
ORAL ORDER
3
06-04-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)
and 328/34 of the IPC.
It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfilment of
dowry demand of Rs.2,50,000/- and a motorcycle by poisoning
his wife to death who was pregnant and prior to that poisoning,
the petitioner along with other co-accused persons used to
torture her for non-fulfilment of dowry.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He
further submits that the deceased was died due to snake bite and
not due to poisoning by the accused persons along with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44497 of 2021(3) dt.06-04-2022
2/2
petitioner.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the
prayer for anticipatory bail.
From perusal of the case diary, it appears that the
prosecution witnesses have supported the case of the
prosecution and postmortem report also reveals that the cause of
death is not ascertained and visera is preserved for chemical
analysis. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased who has
ample responsibility to behave properly to the deceased and the
death was unnatural, considering which, I am not inclined to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Brajesh Kumar/-
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
U
T