HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The High Court of Judicature at Patna – Respondent
CWJC 9089/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9089 of 2022
======================================================
Amit Kumar, aged about 47 years, male, S/o Ram Bahadur Singh, resident of
Village and Post-Bihat, Tola-Maksaspur, Near-Kali Sthan, District-Begusarai,
Bihar, Pin-851135. At present resident of Mohalla-C-86, Rajpur Khurd
Extention, P.S.-South Delhi, District-Delhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The High Court of Judicature at Patna through its Registrar General.
2.
The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Patna.
3.
The Registrar, Appointment, High Court of Judicature at Patna.
4.
The Selection Committee, District Judge (Entry Level), Direct from Bar
Exam-2021, High Court of Judicature at Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
: Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/High Court : Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
Date : 11-08-2022
Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, the learned
Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Piyush Lall, the
learned counsel for the respondent/High Court.
2. The issue involved in the present writ
petition is whether the key answer to Question No. 54
in the Preliminary Test of District Judge (Entry Level),
Patna High Court CWJC No.9089 of 2022 dt.11-08-2022
2/17
Direct from Bar Examination 2021, held under the
Advertisement No. BSJS/1/2021, is incorrect.
3. Question No. 54 in the afore-noted
examination is as follows:-
Q. 54. The concept of “equal protection
of laws” enshrined under Article 14 of the Indian
Constitution finds its root from the -
(A) British Constitution
(B) American Constitution
(C) German Constitution
(D) Australian Constitution.
4. It is the contention of the petitioner that
the correct answer is option-(B), i.e., American
Constitution, whereas the model key answer suggests
option-(A), i.e., British Constitution as the correct
answer.
5. It has been urged on behalf of the
petitioner
that the equality clause of Indian
Constitution has two components; (i) equality before
law and (ii) equal protection of laws. Under the Indian
Constitution, there is a provision for protective
Patna High Court CWJC No.9089 of 2022 dt.11-08-2022
3/17
discrimination which actually is the outcome of the
phrase “equal protection of laws”. This is an exception
to the equality clause. Various treatises on the
subject clearly indicate that the phrase “equal
protection of laws” is similar to one embodied in the
14th Amendment to the American Constitution (refer
to Dicey; the Law of Constitution - 10th Edition).
6. It is a matter of common knowledge that
the concept of equality does not envisage absolute
equality as Dr. Jennings, in the Law of Constitution -
3rd Edition, has explained it: “equality before law
means that amongst equals, law should be equally
administered”.
7. The exact words of the 14th Amendment
of the American Constitution, which was adopted in
1868, is being extracted hereinbelow:-
“All persons born or neutralized in the
United States and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of
the State wherein they reside. No State shall
Patna High Court CWJC No.9089 of 2022 dt.11-08-2022
4/17
make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or amenities of citizens of the United
States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
life, liberty or property without the due process of
law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction,
the equal protection of laws.
(Emphasis provided)
8. This forms part of Section-1 of the
Amending Act.
9. The other sections of the Amending Act
are not being extracted as they may not be neces