HIGH COURT OF PATNA
MD. MUAZZUM @ GUDDU @ MD. MOAZZUM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC. 33419/2019
['Raj Kishor Prasad', 'Arun Kumar Singh', '', 'Shashi Bhushan Kumar', 'Arti Kumari']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33419 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-732 Year-2015 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE
District- Nalanda
======================================================
MD. MUAZZUM @ GUDDU @ MD. MOAZZUM S/o Md. Salim Resident
of Village- Bahadauni, P.S.- Nawada, Dsitrict- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR
2.
Mosrat Khatoon W/o Md. Muazzum @ Guddu, D/o Md. Gaffar R/o Ben,
P.S.- Ben, District- Nalanda
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad
For the State
:
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh
For the Informant
:
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
16
02-12-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party
no. 2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Complaint Case No. 732C/2015 registered under Section
498 A of the Indian Penal Code.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is
that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against
the petitioner.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33419 of 2019(16) dt.02-12-2021
2/2
opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that
petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no. 2. Further
submission is that after due undertaking given by the petitioner
before this Court vide order dated 06.11.2019, the petitioner has
not kept his wife with full honour and dignity and again he is
alleged to have assaulted and tortured his wife. Hence, this is
not a fit case of anticipatory bail.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the
case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioner.
utkarsh/-
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
U
T