HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar and Anr – Respondent
CR. MISC. 737/2018
['Alok Kumar Agrawal', '', 'Priya Gupta', 'VIPUL KANORIA', 'SRI ANIL PRASAD SINGH', '', 'Shiva Shankar Sharma', 'Arun Kumar Sinha', 'Deo Nandan Pd Singh']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.737 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-496 Year-2017 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE
District- Jehanabad
======================================================
1.
Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under the Companies Act,
1956 now under 2013 Act having its place of business at 307, Narayan
Plaza, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town and District Patna
through its Managing Director Sri Ramesh Chandra Gupta S/o Late Sriram
Gupta, R/o Flat No.502, Santosha Apartment, Bandar Bagicha, P.S.-
Kotwali, Town and District- Patna.
2.
Ramesh Chandra Gupta S/o Late Sriram Gupta R/o Flat no.502, Santosha
Apartment, Bandar Bagicha, P.S.- Kotwali, Town and District- Patna.
3.
Binay Kumar Singh S/o Late Ram Kripal Singh, R/o 69, Patliputra Colony,
P.S.- Patliputra Colony, Town and District- Patna.
4.
Vijay Kumar Sinha S/o Late Ram Naresh Lal, R/o Mohalla- South Mandiri,
P.S.- Buddha Colony, Town and District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
State Of Bihar
2.
Md. Afsar Imam S/o Late Md. Akhtar Hussain, R/o at C/o Hindustan Pipe
Bhandar, P.G. Road, Opposite Idgah, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP
For the O.P. No. 2
:
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 20-09-2021
Heard Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Senior Advocate
for the petitioners and Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned
Senior Advocate for the Opposite Party No. 2. The State is
represented by Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, learned APP.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.737 of 2018 dt.20-09-2021
2/20
2. This application has been filed for quashing the
order dated 06.11.2017 passed in Complaint Case No.
496 of 2017 by which cognizance has been taken under
Sections 195, 196, 211, 120B, 420, 504 and 499 of the
Indian Penal Code and Sections 63/65 and 68 of the Copy
Right Act, 1957.
3. The complainant/opposite party no. 2 claims to
be the Managing Director of Freedom Plast Private Limited
having its unit at B-38, Industrial Area, Hajipur (Vaishali).
It has been alleged by him that he has, since 2004,
started manufacturing plastic pipes. However, before that,
he had taken the dealership of Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd.
on the request of petitioner no. 3. He had thereby agreed
to sell the products of Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. through
his firm viz. M/s. Hindustan Pipe Bhandar at Jehanabad.
After becoming the manufacturer of the plastic pipes
himself, he had returned the dealership to the petitioner
no. 1/Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. Per force, the accused
persons had to appoint another dealer viz. M/s. Janta Tube
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.737 of 2018 dt.20-09-2021
3/20
Well for the district of Jehanabad for the sale of their
product. It is in this context that it has been alleged that
the petitioners, with the help of the local dealer, filed a
case against the complainant and his brother with the
allegation of attempting to pass off his goods as the goods
of the petitioners. It was falsely claimed by the petitioner
no. 3 in the FIR viz. Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 344 of
2005, that on information from Janta Tube Well that
duplicate pipes under the brand name of the Shiva Poly
Tubes was being used for laying down Government
tubewell. On this information, petitioners no. 3 and 4 are
said to have visited the place/site and found that fake
pipes under the name of Shiva PVC pipes were being used.
It has also been alleged that it was wrongly claimed by the
petitioners no. 3 and 4 that those fake pipes were
sold/provided by the Hindustan Pipe Bhandar, a
proprietorship firm owned by complainant/op