Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
ARUN KUMAR JHA, J
Divya Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Jugeshwar Nath Srivastava – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of parties and background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for the need of scientific measurement to establish disputed land. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims of suppression of facts by petitioners. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal principles regarding res judicata and conduct of parties. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. precedents and case law supporting arguments against petitioners. (Para 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 6. court's feedback on petitioners' reliance on previous rulings. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 7. court's determination on the finality of orders and grounds for dismissing the petition. (Para 32 , 33 , 39) |
| 8. final dismissal of the petition with directions for the first appellate court. (Para 43 , 44) |
Date : 11-06-2024 The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the part of the order dated 17.01.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-VI, Danapur, Patna in Title Appeal No. 79/2019 (Divya Kumari & Ors. vs. Jugeshwar Nath Srivastava) whereby and whereunder the application of the present petitioners dated 07.04.2022 filed for scientific measurement of the land in question has been dismis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
