HIGH COURT OF PATNA
AAS MOHAMMAD ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ) 3 2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) NO. 3 OF 2000
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) NO. 16 OF 2000
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) NO. 56 OF 2000
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF
SENTENCE DATED 22ND DECEMBER, 1999 PASSED BY SHRI
UMAKANT SRIVASTAVA, 1ST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE,
BHABHUA IN SESSIONS TRIAL NO. 673 OF 1989/134 OF 1999
ARISING OUT OF BHABHUA POLICE STATION CASE NO. 162 OF
1989
========================================================
AAS MOHAMMAD ANSARI, SON OF GUL MOHAMMAD ANSARI,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SONHAN, P.O. AND P.S. SONHAN,
DISTRICT KAIMUR (BHABHUA)
…......... APPELLANT (CR. APP. 3 OF 2000)
WITH
GUL MOHAMMAD ANSARI @ GULLU MIAN, SON OF LATE
JUMMAN MIAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SONHAN, P.O. AND P.S.
SONHAN, DISTRICT KAIMUR (BHABHUA)
…….….. APPELLANT (CR. APP. 16 OF 2000)
WITH
1. HAIDAR ANSARI @ HAIDER ALI ANSARI, SON OF ISRAIL ANSARI
2. SAHIDUL ANSARI, SON OF KARIM ANSARI
3. MUSLIM ANSARI, SON OF AAAS MD. ANSARI
4. AKHTAR HUSSAIN @ AKHTAR ANSARI, SON OF ISRAIL ANSARI
5. TASLIM ANSARI, SON OF AAS MD. ANSARI
6. QUAMUDDIN ANSARI, SON OF IDRIS ANSARI
7. SAHBAN ANSARI, SON OF SULEMAN ANSARI
ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE SONHAN, P.O. AND P.S. SONHAN,
DISTRICT KAIMUR (BHABHUA)
……………. APPELLANTS (CR. APP. 56 OF 2000)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR …….... RESPONDENT (IN ALL APPEALS)
Appearance :
(In CR. APP (SJ) No. 3 of 2000)
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Abbas Haider
Mr. Md.Kamil Akhtar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
(In CR. APP (SJ) No. 16 of 2000)
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Md. Abdul Haque
Mr. Md. Kamil Akhtar
Mr. Syed Firoz Raza
Mr. Abbas Haidar
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3 of 2000 dt.04-07-2012
2 / 7
2
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
(In CR. APP (SJ) No. 56 of 2000)
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Md.Kamil Akhtar
Mr. Syed Firoz Raza
Mr. S.Qaisar Hasan
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 10-07-2012
Sheema Ali Khan, J.
There are three sets of appeals preferred against
the common judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
22nd December, 1999 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions
Judge, Bhabhua in Sessions Trial No. 673 of 1989/134 of 1999
arising out of Bhabhua Police Station Case No. 162 of 1989 and
accordingly, they are disposed of by this common judgment.
2. By the judgment under appeal, the appellants
Aas Mohammad Ansari (Cr. Appeal No. 3 of 2000) and Gul
Mohammad Ansari (Cr. Appeal No. 16 of 2000) were sentenced to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offences
punishable under Section 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The
seven appellants of Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2000 were also
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six years each
for the offences punishable under Section 323 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on
behalf of Gul Mohammad Ansari @ Gullu Mian wherein it has
been stated that Gul Mohammad Ansari died on 12th November,
2001. The death certificate has not been annexed to this
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3 of 2000 dt.04-07-2012
3 / 7
3
supplementary affidavit, therefore, as far as Gul Mohammad
Ansari is concerned, his appeal would abate subject to the
verification by the Trial Court or else the case of Gul Mohammad
Ansari would be governed by the judgment which has been
delivered on merits in this case. It has also been stated that
Sahidul Ansari, appellant of Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 2000 died
on 25th June, 2012. The appeal against him would abate subject
to the verification by the Trial Court or else he would also be
governed by the judgment delivered in this case.
4. The case, as made out in the First Information
Report is that on the basis of the written repor