HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha
PRAKASH DAS – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./35867/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35867 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2017 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui
======================================================
PRAKASH DAS son of Baleshwar Das Resident of Village- Jawatari, P.S.-
Barhat, District- Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Akash Raj
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
3
12-04-2021
Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Laxmipur P.S.
Case No.106 of 2017 registered under Sections 120A, 121A and
122 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of Explosive
Substance Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of U.A.P.
Act.
The informant received information that some naxals
have assembled in the area of Tetaria and Dhaman Kunda forest.
A raiding team was constituted under the leadership of S.P.,
Jamui and they made raid. After seeing the police, some persons
fled away but one Sunil Das was apprehended. A cane bomb and
an electronic detonator were recovered. Sunil Das is said to
have disclosed that Arvind Murmur, Lalo Das, Birendra Das and
Prakash Das(the petitioner) managed to flee away.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all
the allegations are false and concocted. The petitioner resides in
Bangalore and he is a daily wages labourer. He has no
knowledge about his implication in the case. Sunil Das was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35867 of 2020(3) dt.12-04-2021
2/2
apprehended by the police. Sunil Das is the brother-in-law of the
petitioner. Sunil Das is also daily wages worker and he worked
in Delhi. Sunil Das returned to his native village for the purpose
of marriage of his daughter and he was arrested by the police. It
is further submitted that petitioner has got no criminal
antecedent. The police themselves planted cane bomb and
detonator in order to implicate the innocent villagers but it
appears from perusal of the F.I.R. itself that a team was
constituted under the leadership of S.P., Jamui and when raid
was made by the police personnel, many persons fled away
from the place of occurrence. One Sunil Das was apprehended
and he disclosed the name of the petitioner and others who
managed to flee away. From the place of occurrence, explosive
substances were recovered. The petitioner is found to be a
member of banned organization.
Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the same is rejected.
Saurabh/-
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
U
T