HIGH COURT OF PATNA
M/s Mars Dial Net Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
CWJC 15176/2021
['Gautam Kumar Kejriwal', '', 'Alok Kumar Jha', 'Dr K N Singh ASG', '', 'Dhananjay Kashyap', 'Abhijeet', 'Pallavi Trivedi', 'Prashant Sinha', 'Apurv Harsh', 'Sanjeev Kumar', 'Vivek Prasad', 'Dayanand Singh', 'Nagadeo Choubey']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15176 of 2021
======================================================
M/s Mars Dial Net Private Limited a company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 having its office at 203- Hem Plaza, Frazer Road,
Police Station Kotwali, Town and District - Patna through its authorized
signatory Navneet Vats male aged about 30 years Son of Deo Prakash Singh
resident of B- 126, Budha Colony, Hospito India, East Boring Canal, P.S.
Budha Colony, Patna - 800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Government
of India, New Delhi.
2.
The Employees' Provident Fund Organization through the Regional
Provident Fund Commissioner, R- Block, Road No.- 6, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Employees' Provident Fund
Organization, R- Block, Road No. 6, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Coordination), Employees'
Provident Fund Organization, R- Block, Road No. 6, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Bank of Baroda, Main Branch, Patna through its Branch Manager.
6.
The State Bank of India, Mourya Lok Branch, Patna through its Branch
Manager.
7.
The HDFC Bank Ltd. Boring Road Branch, Patna through its Branch
Manager.
8.
The Syndicate Bank/Canara Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna through
its Branch Manager.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15175 of 2021
======================================================
M/s Mars Mountain Security Services Private Limited a Company
incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956, haing its Office at 203-Hem
Plaza. Frazer Road, Police Station Kotwali, Town and District Patna through
its authorised Signatory Navneet Vats Male aged about 30 Years Son of Deo
Prakash Singh Resident of B-126, Budha Colony, Hospito India, East Boring
canal, P.S.-Budha Colony, Patna-800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Government
of India, New Delhi.
2.
The Employees Provident Fund Organization through the Regional
Provident Fund Commissioner, R-Block, Road No.6, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-1, Employees Provident Fund
Patna High Court CWJC No.15176 of 2021 dt.08-10-2021
2/24
Organization, R-Block, Road No.6, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Assistant,Provident Fund Commissioner (Coordination), Employees
Provident Fund Organization, R-Block, Road, No.6, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Bank of Baroda, Main Branch, Patna through its Branch Manager
6.
The Punjab National Bank, Newmarket Branch, Patna through its Branch
Manager.
7.
The State Bank of India, Mourya Lok Branch, Patna through its Branch
Manager
8.
The HDFC Bank Ltd., Boring Road Branch, Patna through its Branch
Manager
9.
The Syndicate Bank/Canara Bank, Exhibition Road Branch, Patna through
its Branch Manager.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance:
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15176 of 2021)
For the Petitioner/s
: Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
: Dr. K.N. Singh (ASG)
For the EPFO
: Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate
For the respondent no. 5 & 7 : Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocate
For the respondent no. 6 : Mr. Dayanand Singh, Advocate
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15175 of 2021)
For the Petitioner/s
: Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
: Dr. K.N. Singh (ASG)
For the EPFO
: Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 08-10-2021
1. Regard being had to the commonality of the
controversy in both the aforesaid writ petitions, it was thought
apposite to hear them analogously and, accordingly, they were
heard together with the consent of the parties and are being
disposed off by the present singul