HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice A. M. Badar
KHAWAJA NASIM ANJAR – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./48641/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48641 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2021 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia
======================================================
Khawaja Nasim Anjar, S/o Late Khawaja Abubakar Resident of Village -
Singhiya Thathol, P.S. - Dagarua, Distt. - Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sudhanshu Saran, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Mustaque Alam, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR
ORAL ORDER
3
11-04-2022
The applicant is given out of turn hearing because of
illness of his family members. This fact is not disputed by the
other side.
The applicant/accused in Crime No. 102 of 2021
registered with Dagarua Police Station for the offences
punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307 r/w 34 of the
Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27of the Arms Act, by this
application is seeking his release on bail during pendency of the
trial and after filing of the charge sheet.
The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
charge sheet has been filed and the applicant is undergoing
pretrial detention.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed
the application by contending that the applicant had admitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48641 of 2021(3) dt.11-04-2022
2/3
to cause injury to two victims named Md. Rijwan (first
informant) as well as Khowaja Salim.
I also heard the learned counsel for the first
informant.
I have considered the submissions so advanced and
also perused the materials placed on record including the
injury certificate of both victims of the subject crime.
Though, it is averred that bullets were fired at them,
injuries suffered by them seem to be simple in nature. It is
apparent that the applicant has used toy-gun for causing
injuries to the victims of the subject crime.
For making out the offence punishable under
Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, what is relevant is
intention and the intention can be gathered from the weapons
used. On conclusion of the investigation, I see no reason to
refuse bail to the application. Hence, the order :-
i. The application is allowed.
ii. The applicant/accused in Crime No. 102 of
2021 registered with Dagarua Police Station be released on bail
on executing P.R. bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
on furnishing surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the
trial court with the following conditions: -
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48641 of 2021(3) dt.11-04-2022
3/3
(I) The applicant/accused should not extend any
threat, promise of inducement to the persons acquainted with the
facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
(II) The applicant/accused should cooperate the
trail court in expeditious disposal of the trial against him.
(III) The applicant/accused should not contact
the members of the prosecuting party as well as witnesses in this
case in any manner till conclusion of the trial.
(IV) The applicant should not repeat
commission of similar offence in future and if he is found to be
involved in commission of similar offence, the State is at liberty
to apply for cancellation of bail granted to the applicant in the
instant case.
The applicant to remove all office objections
forthwith and the Registry to issue the certified copy of this
order only after removal of office objections by the
appellant/accused.
Bhardwaj/-
(A. M. Badar, J)
U
T