SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
Lalan Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CWJC/13152/2019



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13152 of 2019

======================================================

1.

Lalan Prasad Singh Son of Late Mahendra Narayan Singh, Headmaster,

Mahendra Narayan Sumitra Sanskrit Prathmik Cum-Uchch Vidyalay,

Bhuskaul, P.S.- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga.

2.

Amar Kant Mishra Son of Bhupendra narayan Mishra Resident of Village -

Shobhepatti, Thalbara, P.S.- Ashok Pepar Mill, District- Darbhanga,

Secretary- Bhupendra narayan Nunbati Sanskrit Prathmik Cum Uchch

Vidyalay, Shobhepatti Thalbara, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department of Education,

Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar,

Patna.

3.

The Director Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar,

Patna.

4.

The Chairman, Sanskrit Sikchha Board Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Arvind Kumar (Gp23)

For BSSB

:

Mr. S.S. Sundram

Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

ORAL ORDER

2

02-07-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

counsel appearing on behalf of the Sanskrit Sikchha Board as

well as the State.

The issue with regard to allowing the petitioners to

appear at the examination is no more relevant in view of the fact

that examination has already commenced.

The other issue with regard to grant of Praswakriti is

Patna High Court CWJC No.13152 of 2019(2) dt.02-07-2019

2/2

concerned, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the

respondent convened to take appropriate decision at the earliest

after opportunity of hearing to the petitioners by reason

speaking order.

The Court will appreciate favour if the respondents

take appropriate decision within a period of three months from

the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

of.

Ravi/-

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top