PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
RITWIK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ) 2670/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2670 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Munger
======================================================
Ritwik Kumar S/o Prabhunath Prasad R/o village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.-
Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. At present Address is- Udhran Hospital
Bigrahpur By Pass N.H.- 30 Road, Near Mithapur bus Stand, P.S.- Jakkanpur,
District- Patna
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
ARVIND KUMAR MANJHI S/o Late Chandradeep Manjhi R/o village and
P.O.- Rewari, P.S.- Kopa Samhota, District- Saran (Chapra), At Present
Address- C/o Nawal Kishor Yadav Near Purab Sarai D.A.V. Public School,
P.S.- Purab Sarai, District- Munger
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr.Man Mohan Kumar
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Usha Kumari 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
ORAL ORDER
4
08-12-2022
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned
Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant
against the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by learned 1st
Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST Act)
MUnger in ABP No. 379 of 2022 whereby the prayer for bail of
the appellant in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No. 02 of
2022 under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and section
3(i)(zc) of SC/ST Act was rejected.
The prosecution is that the informant’s son belongs to
schedule caste and he deposited Rs. 7,20,000/- in the account of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2670 of 2022(4) dt.08-12-2022
2/3
appellant through cheque bearing No. 248044 for partnership. It
is further alleged that after seven months, the son of informant
was terminated from the hospital partnership and when he
demanded his money from this appellant then found delayed
tendency.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant
that he has committed no offence and has been falsely
implicated in this case. It is further submitted vide para 11 of the
petition that the hospital management has returned lone amount
of Rs. 6,83,000/- to informant’s son either in his bank account or
through cash which is clear from the leser book of the hospital
and from money receipt. It is also submitted that only Rs.
37,000/- is still dues for which hospital management is always
ready to return the same and this fact is corroborated by
Annexure 2 which is annexed with the petition.
The appeal for bail is opposed by learned Spl. P.P. for
the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
taking into consideration that there is general and omnibus
allegation against the appellant, the Court is inclined to allow
this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the
impugned order dated 10.06.2022 passed in A.B.P. No. 379 of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2670 of 2022(4) dt.08-12-2022
3/3
2022 is hereby set aside.
The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in
connection with Munger SC/ST P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 in the
event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a
period of four weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
(Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions
Judge-cum-Special Judge SC/ST Act, Munger.
amandeep/-
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.