SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
RAJ KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./56875/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56875 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2021 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran

======================================================

1.

Raj Kumar Pandey S/O Late Rameshwar Pandey R/O Village-Dudhaila

Gachhi, P.S.- Sonpur, District-Saran.

2.

Ranjit Pandey S/O Late Rameshwar Pandey R/O Village-Dudhaila Gachhi,

P.S.- Sonpur, District-Saran.

3.

Rakesh Kumar S/O Ranjit Pandey R/O Village-Dudhaila Gachhi, P.S.-

Sonpur, District-Saran.

4.

Chhotan Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar S/O Jagdish Singh R/O Village-Moinpur,

P.S.-Bheldi, District-Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Sarva Deo Singh

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

ORAL ORDER

2

20-06-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

a case registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 341, 323, 324, 342, 504, 506, 354, 379, 325,

307 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of making assault to the

informant and other family members by all the F.I.R

named accused persons including the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56875 of 2021(2) dt.20-06-2022

2/3

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioners that petitioners and informant are neighbour.

It is further submitted that at earlier point of time co-

accused Shakuntala Devi has filed Sonepur P.S. Case

No. 03 of 2021 against the informant and others under

Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 504,

506, 385/427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27

of the Arms Act. Hence, in order to put pressure, this

false case has been registered against the petitioners.

There is counter version of the occurrence also and

petitioners’ side also received injuries. There is no

accusation of repeating the blow. The injuries have been

found to be simple in nature. A statement has been

made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no

criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let

the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest

or surrender before the Court below within a period of

four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56875 of 2021(2) dt.20-06-2022

3/3

on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands)

each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at

Chapra in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 110 of

2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Shageer/-

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top