HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
MAHAVIR SINGH @ MAHAVIR KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./44929/2022
A person accused of a serious crime, such as rape, may be entitled to bail if the trial has not been concluded within a period of six months.
Headnote:
POCSO ACT - BAIL - MINOR VICTIM - FALSE IMPLICATION
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was accused of raping a minor girl, taking her obscene photographs and videos, and threatening her to make physical relationship with him showing fear to make her future spoil by making obscene photographs and videos viral.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim had made direct allegations against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since 23.05.2022.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was falsely implicated in the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the nature of the allegations against the petitioner were serious and that he had been in judicial custody for a significant period of time. However, the court also noted that the trial had not been concluded within a period of six months and that the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial was not concluded within that time.
Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's prayer for bail and directed the learned trial court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44929 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2022 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar
======================================================
Mahavir Singh @ Mahavir Kumar Singh Son Of Vishwanath Singh Resident
Of Village - Mahaldar Tola, Azamnagar, District - Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Bimal Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
ORAL ORDER
3
10-01-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has filed the instant application
for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 376, 504, 506 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of POCSO Act.
As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner told the
minor victim girl to come to his house to take books and
notes and when she came to his house, then petitioner
gave her water to drink and after drinking such water
she became unconscious, then petitioner made physical
relationship with her and took her obscene photographs
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44929 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023
2/3
and videos and threatened her to make physical
relationship with him showing fear to make her future
spoil by making obscene photographs and videos viral. It
is alleged that in the month of March, petitioner forcibly
made physical relationship with the victim girl and made
her obscene photographs and video viral.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in
this. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.05.2022. It
is also submitted that victim herself has not disclosed
any specific date about the physical relation in her
statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. and
later on she gave her Statement recorded under Section
164 and said about the specific date of the alleged
occurrence.
Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State
vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner and
submitted that the victim has made direct allegation
against the petitioner of commission of rape, in her
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44929 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023
3/3
statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. She
has also asserted about the complicity of petitioner in
threatening her and taking photographs and making
video of the alleged occurrence.
Having heard the learned counsel for the
parties and considering the nature of allegation, this
court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and,
as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
Learned trial court is directed to expedite the
trial and conclude the same within a period of six
months.
However, if the trial of the petitioner is not
concluded within a period of six months, he would be at
liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
nirajkrs/-
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
U
T