SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MD. MATIN – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
['Sandip Kumar Gautam', 'A G', '', 'Mohammad Sufyan']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.320 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2020 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai

======================================================

MD. MATIN Son of Md. Sadrul @ Sadrul Resident of Village- Sirsi, Ward

No.08, P.S.- Khodawandpur, Distt- Gegusarai

... ... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

2

09-03-2021

Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to

remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four

weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

Spl. P.P. for the State.

The appellant in the present case is seeking to set

aside the order dated 21.10.2020 passed by learned Special

Judge SC/ST, (Prevention of Atrocities Act), Begusarai in

connection with Khodwandpur P.S. Case No. 188 of 2020

registered fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top