IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43419 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2019 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka

======================================================

Bihari Kumar Singh, Son of Rajesh Singh Resident of Village and P.S.-

Katoria, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER

2

16-07-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

Katoria P.S. Case No.18 of 2019 for the offence punishable

under Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

2016.

The allegation against the petitioner that the police

during the course of patrolling intercepted one red colour Majic

vehicle bearing Registration No.JH-155-9574 and upon seeing

the police party, the person/ driver who was driving the vehicle

fled away and the vehicle in question was seized by the police

and upon search, the police party recovered five bags containing

40 kg of Mahua having a total quantity of 200 kg. kept in the

bag.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43419 of 2019(2) dt.16-07-2019

2/2

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is innocent having no criminal antecedent and has

falsely been implicated due to the oblique motive by the police,

however, except the fact that vehicle belongs to the petitioner,

no other circumstances is there against the petitioner.

After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner

as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and

taking into consideration the fact that Mahua which was seized

from the vehicle which is owned by the petitioner, accordingly,

in view of Full Bench judgment passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ)

No.431 of 2019, I am not inclined to exercise my discretion

under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. As such, the present anticipatory

bail application is rejected.

If the petitioner surrenders before the Court below

within fifteen days from today, the learned Court below shall

consider his application for regular bail on the same day without

being prejudiced by the rejection order of this Court.

sanjeev/-

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

U

T