SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha
Sadhu Paswan and Ors – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC./59775/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59775 of 2018

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2018 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada

======================================================

1.

Sadhu Paswan S/o Manik Paswan,

2.

Mithu Paswan S/o Naresh Paswan,

3.

Mithilesh Paswan S/o Fekan Paswan,

4.

Arvind Paswan S/o Lagan Paswan,

5.

Sajan Ram S/o Indu Ram,

All are R/o Vill.- Parto Karhari, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Madhuranand Jha

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER

3

08-04-2019

Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

connection with Spl. (P) 14/18 (POCSCO 05/18) arising out of

Akbarpur P.S. Case No.51 of 2018 dated 3.3.2018 , registered

for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324,

307, 337, 354, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section POCSO Act, 2012.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting the

informant and several other persons and allegation against the

petitioner no.3 is that he tried to outrage the modesty of Ranju

Kumari, a minor girl aged about 16 years.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59775 of 2018(3) dt.08-04-2019

2/2

that there is case and counter case between the parties and all

the injuries are simple in nature, which he has annexed as

Supplementary Affidavit and further the police after

investigation has not found the case true under section 4 of the

POCSO Act.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named,

in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within

a period of six weeks from the date of order be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand)

each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Nawada in connection

with Spl. (P) 14/18 (POCSCO 05/18) arising out of Akbarpur

P.S. Case No.51 of 2018 subject to condition as laid down under

Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is

allowed.

chn/-

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top