HIGH COURT OF PATNA
AFTAB ALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR and ORS – Respondent
CR. REV. 1786/2009
['CHANDRA MOHAN JHA', '', 'RAJESH KUMAR SINGH', 'M CHATERJEEAPP', '', 'MD NAUSHADUZZOHA', 'MD IRSHAD']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.1786 of 2009
======================================================
Aftab Alam
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
State Of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
ORAL ORDER
4
19-12-2012
Issue notice to opposite party no. 2 and 3 both by ordinary
process as also by registered post with A/D to show cause as to
why the reliefs prayed for on behalf of the petitioner in the present
application be not granted to him.
Requisite etc. for issuance of notice must be filed on or
before 15th January 2013, failing which this application shall stand
rejected without further reference to a Bench.
Rule is made returnable on 22nd March 2013.
However, the present order is subject to deposit of Rs.
40,000/- by the petitioner before the learned Family Court below
on or before 7th March 2013 towards part payment of arrears of
maintenance payable by the petitioner to the O.P. No. 2 and 3. The
aforesaid amount of Rs. 40,000/- may be deposited by the
petitioner either in lump sum or in two equal instalments with the
permission of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,
Madhubani, failing which the present application shall be treated
to have been finally rejected by this Court.
On deposit of the aforesaid amount of Rs. 40,000/- by the
petitioner within the time prescribed by this Court, the petitioner
shall be obliged to file an affidavit on or before 15th March 2013
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1786 of 2009 (4) dt.19-12-2012
2/2
showing compliance of the present order, failing which also the
present application shall be construed to have been rejected by this
Court.
It is clarified that in case of non-compliance of the present
order either regarding deposit of Rs. 40,000/- within the time
prescribed or regarding filing of affidavit, as directed above, the
matter shall not be listed on the rule returnable date fixed. On
failure of the petitioner to deposit the aforesaid amount, the
learned Family Court shall be at liberty to take all possible
coercive measures against the petitioner for recovery of entire
arrears of maintenance, as per the order passed by the learned
Family Court below.
BTiwary/-
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)