SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ROHIT YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 1571/2021



Advocates:
['Pawan Kumar Singh', 'A G', '', 'Binod Kumar']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1571 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

======================================================

Rohit Yadav Son of Bihari Yadav, Resident of Village - Bhatani, P.S. - Chand,

District – Kaimur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

ORAL ORDER

3

09-04-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State through virtual court proceedings.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing rape

to the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

case at the instance of his enemies. There is no occurrence took

place as alleged in the FIR, which itself appears to be false and

doubtful. He further submits that in the statement of the victim

recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she refused the allegation of

rape committed by the petitioner and further declared her age

about 12 years and learned court below has assessed her age to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1571 of 2021(3) dt.09-04-2021

2/2

be 16 years. In medical report her age assessed 17-19 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that

the victim claimed over her family member who putting

pressure not to sign on any paper without their consent,

concealing the real facts, which appears to be doubtful the

prosecution version. The petitioner is languishing in judicial

custody since 15.10.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal

antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail

of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in

connection with POCSO Case No. 41/2020 arising out of

Bhabua Mahila P.S. Case No. 79/2020 to the satisfaction of

learned Court below where the case is pending.

amitkumar/-

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top