HIGH COURT OF PATNA
BINAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ) 496/2021
['Ratneshwar Prasad', '', 'Yogendra Kumar Singh', 'A G', '', 'Binay Krishna', 'Spl P P']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No. 496 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
======================================================
Binay Kumar. Male, aged about 38 years, Son of Naval Kishor Singh,
Resident of Mohalla- New Area Mahabir Nagar Purani Jail Road, PS- Nagar
(Town), District- Nawada.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Ratneshwar Prasad, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Binay Krishna, Special PP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 26-08-2021
The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Ratneshwar Prasad, learned counsel for the
appellant and Mr. Binay Krishna, learned Special Public
Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Special PP’) for the
State.
3. The present appeal is directed against the order dated
02.11.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st-
cum-Special Judge the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Nawada in ABP No. 1239 of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.496 of 2021 dt.26-08-2021
2/5
2020, by which prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has
been rejected.
4. The appellant apprehends arrest in connection with
Nawada Town PS Case No. 133 of 2020 / Special Case (SC/ST)
No. 22 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020, instituted under Sections 419,
420, 323, 427, 504, 304, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 3(2)
v of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989.
5. As per the FIR, the informant Sudhir Kumar has
alleged that the wife of his brother was pregnant on 07.02.2020 at
4:00 PM, and she was admitted to Sadar Hospital, Nawada from
where a lady doctor had referred her to Magadh Medical College,
Gaya and when they were coming out of the gate of the Sadar
Hospital, Nawada, co-accused Ranju Devi and Panchali Devi,
Asha workers, had said that unnecessarily the case has been
referred to Magadh Medical College, Gaya and that the patient
would be properly attended by a qualified doctor and took them to
Maa Ahilya Janch Ghar where she was advised to undergo
cesarean operation for delivery and despite the informant’s side
not being in favour, pressure was exerted and deposit of Rs.
50,000/- was also taken, and a child was born, but the condition of
mother deteriorated and she died at 10:00 PM. It was further
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.496 of 2021 dt.26-08-2021
3/5
alleged that on inquiry it had come to light that the said Janch
Ghar had no qualified doctor, and the aforesaid co-accused
knowing that the informant belonged to Harijan community, had
deliberately got the operation conducted by a quack and in the
process, his sister-in-law had died.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
land on which the said Maa Ahilya Janch Ghar is built belongs to
the wife of the appellant and except for this, the appellant or his
wife are not even remotely connected to the said Janch Ghar. It
was submitted that he was not even named in the FIR, but later the
police has implicated him just because he was the husband of the
owner of the land on which the Janch Ghar is constructed.
Learned counsel submitted that the two named co-accused Ranju
Devi and Panchali Devi have been granted anticipatory bail by a
co-ordinate Bench by order dated 09.04.2021 passed in Cr. Appeal
(SJ) No. 1871 of 2020. It was submitted that the appellant has no
other criminal antecedent.
7. Learned APP submitted that the wife of the brother of
the informant had died in Janch Ghar built on the land belonging
to the wife of the appellant. However, it was not controverted that
there is no allegation with regard to the appellant