SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice S. Kumar
Mohan Ray – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CWJC/17588/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17588 of 2021

======================================================

Mohan Ray Son of Horil Ray, Resident of Village-Banbira, P.S.-Tajpur (O.P.

Halai), District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secreary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrarte-Cum-Collector, Samastipur.

4.

The Excise Superintendent, Samastipur.

5.

The Presiding Officer (Excise)-Cum-Deputy Commissioner of Land

Reforms, Dalsingh Sarai District-Samastipur.

6.

The Police Sub Inspector P.S. Angarghat, District-Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Md. Hussamuddin Azad, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Lalit Kishore (A.G.)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

Date : 10-12-2021

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-

“(i) For issuance of a direction commanding the

respondents to release the motorcycle (GCL Splendor

Plus) of the petitioner bearing Registration No.

BR09W 5742, Engine No. HA10AGHHB65408,

Chassis No. MBLHAR086HHB82491 in favour of

the petitioner, which was seized by the police Sub-

Inspector P.S. Angarghat in Angarghat P.S. Case No.

67/2020 dated 19.08.2020.

(ii) And for any other relief or reliefs to which the

petitioner may be found entitled in course of hearing

of this petition.”

Patna High Court CWJC No.17588 of 2021 dt.10-12-2021

2/2

Petitioner has approached this Court without

exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned

order, as such, petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedy of

appeal against the confiscation order passed by the Confiscating

Authority- cum- District Magistrate, before the Appellate

Authority and if any such appeal is filed within 8 weeks then

appellate authority shall condone the delay in filing the appeal

and shall decide the appeal on its own merit preferably within 8

weeks from the date of its filing.

During pendency of appeal, the confiscated vehicle

shall not be auction sold, if not already auction sold.

With aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed

of.

Rajiv/veena-

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J)

AFR/NAFR

CAV DATE

Uploading Date

Transmission Date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top