HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad
Puja Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State Election Commission (Panchayat), – Respondent
CWJC/17961/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17961 of 2021
======================================================
Puja Kumari Daughter of Sajan Chaupal and Wife of Ram Dayal Yadav,
resident of Village - Jhanjpatti, Doman, P.O. Hudra, P.S.- Khutauna, District-
Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel
Path, Patna through the State Election Commissioner.
2.
The State Election Commissioner, The State Election Commission
(Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna
3.
The Secretary, The State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan,
Birchand Patel Path, Patna.
4.
The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat),
Madhubani, District- Madhubani.
5.
The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.
6.
The Block Development Officer, Khutauna-cum-Returning Officer, District-
Madhubani.
7.
The Circle Officer Khutauna, District- Madhubani.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner
:
Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate
Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate
For State Election Commission
:
Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate
For the Respondent
:
Mr. Ajay ( GP-5 )
Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH)
Date : 10-05-2022
The petitioner has chosen to file this writ
application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking quashing of an order dated 25.09.2021, passed by the
Block Development Officer, Khutauna-cum-Returning Officer
in the district of Madhubani, whereby the petitioner's
Patna High Court CWJC No.17961 of 2021 dt.10-05-2022
2/6
nomination to contest the election for the post of Mukhia of
Gram Panchayat Raj, Durgipatti came to be rejected on the
ground that the caste certificate enclosed by the petitioner along
with his nomination paper had not been found to be certified in
terms of the report submitted by the concerned Circle Officer.
The petitioner is also seeking a direction from this Court to the
respondent No. 6 in the present writ application to accept the
nomination paper of the petitioner and allow her to contest the
Panchayat Election 2021 for the post of Mukhia of Gram
Panchayat Raj, Durgipatti on the ground that rejection of her
nomination by respondent No. 6 is wholly illegal. There is a
third prayer, seeking direction to the respondent Election
Commission for blacklisting the Block Development Officer
Khutauna and the Circle Officer, Khatauna for their deputation
in the election duty in future as also for their immediate transfer
from their respective posts, since in the presence of the said
respondents, i.e., The Block Developement Officer, Khutauna
and The Circle Officer, Khutauna there was no possibility of
free and fair election.
2.
It is not in dispute that the Gram Panchayat
General Elections in the State of Bihar have already been held
and election results have been announced, including for the post
Patna High Court CWJC No.17961 of 2021 dt.10-05-2022
3/6
of Mukhia of Gram Panchayat, Durgapatti, long back.
3.
In response to a Court's query as to whether this
writ application has become infructuous, Mr. S.B.K. Manglam,
learned counsel for the petitioner has insisted that the first relief,
which has been prayed for on behalf of the petitioner still
survives. He submits that he will not be pressing the second
relief as sought for in the present writ application.
4.
Despite this Court's observations, Mr. Manglam has
insisted that this Court must address the issue regarding
rejection by the Returning Officer of the nomination paper filed
by the petitioner to contest the election to the post of M