SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIKASH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC. 7902/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7902 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai

======================================================

Vikash Kumar Son of Jai Prakash Singh, R/o Village- Gokhula, P.S.-

Sikandra, Dist.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY

ORAL ORDER

2

10-02-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in

connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 359 of 2019 registered for

offence punishable under sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471,

120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66B, 66C of

the I.T. Act.

Earlier the petitioner had moved before this Court

for grant of regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 3839 of 2020 and this

Court, vide order dated 29.05.2020, rejected the prayer of bail of

the petitioner with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after

completion of one year in jail custody.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has remained in jail custody for more than one year.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7902 of 2021(2) dt.10-02-2021

2/2

In such view of the matter, let the petitioner above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in

connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 359 of 2019, subject to

the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his

close relative. The petitioner will not induce any witness or

tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the

disposal of trial and make himself available as and when

required by the court. In case of failure on two consecutive

dates, the court below will have liberty to pass an order

including cancel the bail of the petitioner.

This order has been passed in presence of Mr. Satya

Nand Shukla, learned counsel for the State.

Mahesh/-

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top