HIGH COURT OF PATNA
MUNNA LAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR and ANR – Respondent
CR. REV. 1869/2009
['YOGENDRA PD SINHA', '', 'SURESH PRASAD', 'M N JHAAPP']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.1869 of 2009
======================================================
Munna Lal Yadav son of Dahari Yadav, resident of village- Kararia Thakur
Rai, P.S.- Phulwaria, District- Gopalganj
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Smt. Lal Munni Devi D/O Late Sheobachan Chaudhary, R/O Village-
Tulasia, P.S. Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj
.... .... Opp. Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad, Adv.
For the State : Mr. M.N.Jha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
ORAL ORDER
4
19-12-2012
After having heard the parties, this Court does not find
any legal infirmity or procedural irregularity warranting any
interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction
in the impugned order dated 30.10.2009 passed in Miscellaneous
Case No. 288 of 2000 by the learned Principal Judge, Family
Court, Gopalganj, whereby in exercise of his powers under
Section 127 Cr. P. C. he has enhanced the quantum of
maintenance payable by the petitioner to the opposite party no.2
from Rs. 400/- per month to Rs. 1000/- per month only.
Taking into consideration the present day price index, this
Court is of the opinion that the amount of maintenance fixed at the
enhanced rate of Rs. 1000/- per month cannot be said to be
excessive by any standard.
The application stands dismissed.
However, in the given facts of the case, the petitioner shall
be permitted to deposit the arrears of maintenance, if any, as per
the impugned order within a maximum period of three months
from today. In case the petitioner does not pay/ deposit the entire
arrears of maintenance within the time prescribed by this Court
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1869 of 2009 (4) dt.19-12-2012
2/2
and fails to keep on depositing the current amount of maintenance
as per the impugned order on month to month basis, the learned
Principal Judge, Family Court, Gopalganj shall be at liberty to
take all possible coercive measures against the petitioner for
recovery of the aforesaid amount.
Let this order be communicated to the learned court below
forthwith.
BTiwary/-
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)