HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
YOGENDRA PRAJAPAT @ YOGENDRA PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./7128/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7128 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Gaya
======================================================
YOGENDRA PRAJAPAT @ YOGENDRA PRAJAPATI S/O BODHO PRA-
JAPATI R/O VILLAGE- PACHMAHLA, P.S.- JORI, DISTRICT- CHATRA
(JHARKHAND)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR
2.
PRATIMA DEVI W/O YOGENDRA PRAJAPAT @ YOGENDRA PRA-
JAPATI, D/O SULENDRA PRAJAPAT R/O VILL.- DEVANIYAN, P.S.-
BARACHATTI, DIST.- GAYA
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s
:
Mr. APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
ORAL ORDER
4
30-03-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been
filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with
Complaint Case no. 125 of 2019 instituted for the offence under
Sections 498A and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of
the Dowry Prohibition Act.
As per allegation in the FIR, due to non-fulfimment of
dowry demand of Rs. One lakh, petitioner along with other family
members started to abuse and torture her mentally and physically.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7128 of 2021(4) dt.30-03-2022
2/3
petitioner is husband of the informant and he is ready to keep the
informant as wife with full dignity and honour.
The aforesaid offer of the petitioner has not been
accepted by the informant who denies to go to her matrimonial
house and live with her husband. However, she prays for some
maintenance for her survival as she is a housewife and she is not
able to maintain herself .
In the alternative, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, on instructions, submits that petitioner is ready
to give six thousand per month from this month, subject to
furnishing bank account number by the informant to the
petitioner.
In the changed circumstance, learned counsel for the
informant admits that he shall provide bank account number of
the informant to the petitioner within a period of one week from
today. On receipt of the bank account number of the informant,
the petitioner shall deposit Rs. 6,000/- (Six Thousand) in first
week of every month commencing from April as maintenance in
the account furnished by the informant.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, this
Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner, above
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7128 of 2021(4) dt.30-03-2022
3/3
named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before learned Court
below within a period of four weeks from today, shall be released
on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten
Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with
Complaint Case No. 125 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid
down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order
passed in the maintenance case for final settlement.
sushma/-
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
U
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.