SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma
VAHID JAMAL @ SEIKH LAL BABU – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./62188/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62188 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2021 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran

======================================================

VAHID JAMAL @ SEIKH LAL BABU Son of Khaliku Zama Resident of

Village- Zhumka, P.S.- Sikta, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Bhagya Narayan Jha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

ORAL ORDER

2

13-07-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411

and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

alleges that he had parked his motorcycle in the night in front of

his house but in the morning he could not locate the same and

thus based on CCTV footage lodged the FIR regarding theft of

his motorcycle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and his

name transpired in the confessional statement of apprehended

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62188 of 2021(2) dt.13-07-2022

2/2

accused which has no evidentiary value, it is next submitted that

petitioner is a young boy of 19 years of age and he was not

identified in the CCTV footage.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is a young

boy of 19 years and is a person with clean antecedent, the

petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks

from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

below where the case is pending/successor court in connection

with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 68 of 2021 subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father

Khaliku Zama.

Shivam/-

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top