HIGH COURT OF PATNA
ALI HUSSAIN MIAN and ORS – Appellant
Versus
ALIMUDDIN ANSARI @ ALIMUDDIN – Respondent
MJC 2925/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MJC No.2925 of 2009
1. ALI HUSSAIN MIAN, SON OF LATE MADHO MIAN.
2. KALIMUDDIN MIAN.
3. FIROZ ANSARI.
4. SEROZ ANSARI.
5. ISLAM MIAN.
ALL SONS OF ALI HUSSAIN AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-
AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR.
6. SAMSHHDDIN ANSARI.
7. NAZEEM MIAN.
BOTH SONS OF LATE ISHU MIAN AND RESIDENTS OF
VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGAJAION, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF RAJENDRA NAGAR,
TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, P.S. KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT-
PATNA-800016.
8. MOST. QURASHA, WIFE OF LATE MD. LATIF ANSARI,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMRAO, P.O. SIMRAO, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR.
…………………………………………………………..PETITONERS.
Versus
1. ALIMUDDIN ANSARI @ ALIMUDDIN, SON OF SAHEED MIAN,
RESIDENT
OF
VILLAGE
AGJAIAON,
P.O.
AND
P.S.
AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR.
2. SULEMAN
ANSARI,
SON
OF
LATE
RAHMAT
MIAN,
RESIDENT OF TELEPHONE EXCHANGE DHAUREJEE, P.O.
DHAUREJEE, DISTRICT-RAJKOT(GUJRAT).
3. NASRUDDIN ANSARI ALIAS SULTAN, SON OF
LATE
RAHMAT MIAN, TELEPHONE EXCHANGE DHAUREJEE, P.O.
DHAUREJEE, DISTRICT-RAJKOT(GUJRAT) 260410.
4. SHAHABUDDIN, SON OF LATE ABDUL MIAN, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR.
5. ASHRAT ANSARI, SON OF SHAHABUDDIN, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR.
6. NASRUDDIN ANSARI, SON OF LATE IDRIS MIAN.
7. TAFAZUL ANSARI.
8. JALALUDDIN ANSARI.
9. SHARFUDDIN ANSARI.
10. SHAFIQUE ANSARI.
ALL SONS OF NASRUDDIN MIAN.
11. KULSUM BEGUM , WIFE OF NASRUDDIN ANSARI.
ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S.
AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR.
12. SADIQUE ALIAS SHAHID, SON OF IDRIS MIAN, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR.
- 2 -
13. BACHHU LAL, SON OF HARI SHANKAR LAL, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE AGJAIAON, P.O. AND P.S. AGJAIAON, DISTRICT-
BHOJPUR.
…………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES.
-----------
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Ram Kishun Prasad, Advocate.
--------
3.
9.10.2009.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
This application has been filed for restoration of Civil
Revision No.2261 of 2006 which stood dismissed for want of
prosecution on 28.8.2009.
On being satisfied with the reasons furnished in this
application, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No.2261 of
2006 is restored to its original file.
P.S.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)