HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma
Nilesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
CR. APP (DB)/443/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.405 of 2014
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2010 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Nepali Yadav Son of Late Tuntun Yadav R/o Village New Sidhighat,
Sultanganj, P.S. Sultanganj, District Bhagalpur.
... ... Appellant.
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent.
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 443 of 2014
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2010 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Nilesh Yadav S/o Yogi Yadav Resident of Mohalla New Sidhi Ghat,
Sultanganj, P.S. Sultanganj, District Bhagalpur.
... ... Appellant.
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent.
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 405 of 2014)
For the Appellant
:
Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Senior Advocate.
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate.
Ms. Suruchi Anand, Advocate.
For the State
:
Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Amicus Curiae.
(In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 443 of 2014)
For the Appellant
:
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate.
For the State
:
Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Amicus Curiae.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR)
Date : 25-07-2022
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.405 of 2014 is filed by
appellant/ convicted accused Nepali Yadav whereas Criminal
Appeal (DB) No.443 of 2014 is filed by appellant/convicted
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.405 of 2014 dt.25-07-2022
2/41
accused Nilesh Yadav. By these appeals, they are challenging
the Judgment and Order dated 15.04.2014 and 19.04.2014
respectively passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions
Judge-IV, Bhagalpur, in Sessions Trial No.170 of 2012, thereby
convicting them of the offences punishable under Section 302
read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section
27 of the Arms Act. Appellant/convicted accused Nepali Yadav
is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life apart from a
direction to pay fine of Rs.25000/- and in default, to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable
under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. For
the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, he is
sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years apart
from a direction to pay fine of Rs.2000/- and in default, to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Appellant/
convicted accused Nilesh Yadav is sentenced to suffer life
imprisonment apart from a direction to pay fine of Rs.5000/-
and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year
for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of the
Indian Penal Code. For the offence punishable under Section 27
of the Arms Act, he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment
for two years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.1000/- and in
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.405 of 2014 dt.25-07-2022
3/41
default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three
months. Substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently.
As both these appeals are arising out of the same Judgment and
Order of conviction and resultant sentence imposed on the
accused therein, those are being decided by this common
Judgment. For the sake of convenience, the appellants shall be
referred to in their original capacity as “the accused”.
2. Facts in brief leading to the prosecution of the
accused persons can be summarized thus:
(a). According to the prosecution case, both accused
persons in furtherance of their common intention along with co-
accused Vibhishan Yadav had committed murder of Rohit
Kumar on 12.03.2010 by firing bullets at him at the bank of
river Ganga at New Sidhi