HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey
SURENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./63234/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63234 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya
======================================================
1.
SURENDRA YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali R/o Village - Dadpur,
P.S. Magadh University, District - Gaya.
2.
RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali R/o
Village - Dadpur, P.S. Magadh University, District - Gaya.
3.
DHARMENDRA YADAV S/o Birju Yadav R/o Village - Dadpur, P.S.
Magadh University, District - Gaya.
4.
PARSHURAM KUMAR @ PASURAM KUMAR S/o Jitendra Yadav @
Nepali R/o Village - Dadpur, P.S. Magadh University, District - Gaya.
5.
SHANKAR YADAV S/o Late Bachu Yadav R/o Village - Dadpur, P.S.
Magadh University, District - Gaya.
6.
NIRANJAN YADAV S/o Kesho Yadav R/o Village - Dadpur, P.S. Magadh
University, District - Gaya.
7.
CHANDAN YADAV S/o Kesho Yadav R/o Village - Dadpur, P.S. Magadh
University, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2
20-07-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to
remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within
one month.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has
submitted that during the pendency of this anticipatory bail
application, petitioner no.2 has been arrested and, as such, the
same has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63234 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022
2/3
to withdraw this application as against petitioner no.2.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the application is
dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous as
against petitioner no 2.
Petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 apprehend their
arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149,
448, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of
the Arms Act, registered in connection with Magadh University
P.S.Case No. 20 of 2021.
Heard the learnned counsel for the as well as Mr.
Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.
As per allegation, when the informant was
proceeding by his car, his vehicle was intercepted by putting log
on the road. 10 accused persons named in the FIR started
assaulting his vehicle. The further allegation is that accused
persons opened indiscriminate fire and they also pelted stones
etc. They asked the informant to vacate the disputed land.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence
and have falsely been implicated. There is admittedly land
dispute between the parties. He has submitted further that
though there is allegation of firing, but none has sustained any
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63234 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022
3/3
kind of injury.
Considering the above facts and circumstances, let
petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, above-named, in the event of
their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of
communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Smt. Neha
Tripathi, J.M. 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Magadh
University P.S.,Case No. 20 of 2021, subject to the conditions
as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.
Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by
the petitioners within the stipulated time provided hereinabove,
failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this
Court.
HR/-
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
U