HIGH COURT OF PATNA
JANG BAHADUR SINGH and ORS – Appellant
Versus
SEC.LAW DEPT.GOVT.OF BIHAR andOR – Respondent
C. REV. 195 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVIEW NO.195 OF 2009
IN
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. 18755 OF 2008
==================================================
1.JANG BAHADUR SINGH, ADVOCATE, CIVIL COURT, NAWADAH SON
OF LATE KAILASH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE GONAWAN, P.O.
GONAWAN, P.S NAWADAH, DISTRICT NAWADA.
2.RANJEET KUMAR, ADVOCATE, CIVIL COURT, NAWADAH, S/O
LATE RAM LAKHAN PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE BADLU BIGHA, P.S
NARDIGANJ, DISTRICT NAWADA.
3.RAM KUMAR, ADVOCATE, CIVIL COURT, NAWADAH, S/O SRI
BIHARI PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE GOGAN, P.S.NEMDARGANJ, P.S
AKABARPUR, DISTRICT NAWADA.
.... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1.SECRETARY LAW (JUSTICE) DEPT.GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA.
2.THE COMMISSIONER, MAGADH DIVISION GAYA, (BIHAR).
3.THE COLLECTOR, NAWADAH, DISTRICT NAWADA.
4.SRI BHARAT PRASAD, ADVOCATE,ENROLLMENT NO.4507/96,
CIVIL COURT, NAWADA(BIHAR).
.... .... RESPONDENT/S
==================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner: Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Lalit Kishore, AAG-I,
Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate,
No. 4.
Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Advocate,
Mr.Bimal Kumar Datta,Advocate
==================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA
and
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA)
Date: 18-12-2012
Heard counsel for the parties.
2. In this application the petitioner have
made a prayer for recall/review of the order dated
25.3.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18755 of 2008 and
consequently also consider afresh their prayer in the
aforesaid writ application.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner at the
Patna High Court C. REV. No.195 of 2009 dt.____-12-2012
2
outset has prayed for condonation of delay in filing
of this review application by referring to the facts
mentioned in this application. This Court in fact for
the purposes of condoning the delay in filing this
application has also taken into consideration that
the order sought to be reviewed dated 25.03.2009
passed in C.W.J.C No. 18755 of 2008 was subsequently
made subject matter of Special Leave Petition, S.L.P
No. 11879 of 2009 before the Apex Court which was
withdrawn by the petitioners on 15.05.2009 with a
leave to file this review application and thereafter
this review application was filed on 15.07.2009. Thus
the delay in filing of this review application being
well explained is hereby condoned specially when the
respondent-opposite parties in pursuance of notice
issued by this Court on 21.04.2010 in the limitation
matter have also filed no counter affidavit objecting
to the prayer for condonation of delay in filing of
the review application.
4. Coming to the merits of the case, it has to
be only noted that the petitioners had earlier filed
C.W.J.C No. 18755 of 2008, wherein, they had assailed
the order dated 04.12.2008 appointing respondent
no.4, Bharat Prasad as Incharge Government Pleader of
Civil Court, Nawada under the orders of the Law
Secretary
of
the
Government
of
Bihar
dated
04.12.2008.
The
said
application
was,
however,
Patna High Court C. REV. No.195 of 2009 dt.____-12-2012
3
dismissed by an order dated 25.03.2009, which reads
as follows:-
“Heard counsel for the parties.
This writ petition relates to appointment of
Government Pleader in the District of Nawadah.
It is the case of the petitioner that the
District & Sessions Judge recommended names of
seven persons for appointment of Government
Pleader in the District of Nawadah and out of
seven names, the Collector of the district
forearded
the
names
of
five
persons
and
thereafter two more names were sent by the
Collector including the name of Bharat Prasad,
who was appointed as a the Government Pleader
and his name was earlier not consulted with t