SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan
MANNA LAL @ MANNA LAL PASWAN @ AJAY PASWAN @ AJAY KUMAR @ AKSHAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./65734/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65734 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-626 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C

District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

======================================================

MANNA LAL @ MANNA LAL PASWAN @ AJAY PASWAN @ AJAY

KUMAR @ AKSHAY KUMAR Son of Satyanarayan Paswan @

Satyanarayan Ram Resident of Village - Sakhra, Police station - Dehri- On-

Sone, District Rohtas at presently Spinrus Pvt. Ltd., Village - Tunki Kalsa,

Police station - Gaura Ram (Misbal), District - Misbal Andhra Pradesh,

Haidrabad, Pin -502336.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Amrita Kumari D/o Mahendra Paswan Resident of Village - Bhagwanpur,

Police Station - Bhagwanpur, District - Kaimur, Pin- 821102.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Rani Prasad

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

ORAL ORDER

4

05-09-2022

Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove

the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court

proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within

stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered

for the offence punishable under section 406 and 498A of the

IPC though the complaint was lodged under sections 498A, 392,

307, 323, 406/34 of Indian Penal Code but the cognizance was

taken only u/s 498 A, 406 of IPC.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65734 of 2021(4) dt.05-09-2022

2/2

Vide order dated 24.06.2022, this matter was refered to

the mediation centre.

A mediation report dated 10.08.2022, is kept at Flag ‘M’.

From perusal of the same it is evident that the petitioner and

O.P. no.2 are living together. This fact is also supported by the

learned counsel for the O.P. no.2.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event

of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a

period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Complaint

Case No.626 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down

under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

shikha/-

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top