SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh
RAJ NARAYAN JHA @ RAJ NARAYAN OJHA – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./65088/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65088 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2021 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District-

Muzaffarpur

======================================================

1.

Raj Narayan Jha @ Raj Narayan Ojha Son of Late Bhikhari Ojha Resident

of Village -Dighara Patti, P.S. - Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur.

2.

Poonam Devi Wife of Raj Narayan Jha @ Raj Narayan Ojha Resident of

Village -Dighara Patti, P.S. - Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Udbhav

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

ORAL ORDER

2

24-05-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sadar P.S. Case

No. 462 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 363/366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in brief is that co-accused Vikky

Kumar with the help of petitioners and other persons enticed

away the minor daughter of informant.

It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely

implicated in this case. The victim girl in her statement under

Section 164 Cr.P.C has not alleged any mis-conduct against

these petitioners and she has disclosed her age to be 19 years.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65088 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022

2/2

Petitioners have been made accused in this case simply because

they are father and mother of co-accused Vikky Kumar.

In view of the statement of victim girl under Section

164 Cr.P.C, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their

arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six

weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this

order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.

462 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

vinita/-

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top