SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Bihar Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India and Ors – Respondent
CWJC 8657/2013



Advocates:
['Pramod Kumar Sinha', '', 'Arvind Kumar Sharma', 'A UJJWAL', '', 'Harendra Kumar Tiwary', 'N A Shamsi A S G', 'Ashok Kumar Sinha', 'RANJEET KUMAR CGC', 'Mrigank Mauli', 'Santosh Kumar Singh']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8657 of 2013

======================================================

1. Bihar Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Gola Road, West

Bailey Road, Patna, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna, through its Permanent

Principal Dr. Kameshwar Singh, now alleged to bee dismissed which is

subjudiced

2. Dr. Kameshwar Singh S/O Late Deep Narain Singh, permanent Principal,

(Now however said to be dismissed, which is subjudiced in L.P.A. No.

1714/2011) Bihar Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Patna,

Resident of Manik Niwas, H.No. B-12, Anand Vihar Colony, Ambedkar

Path, Bailey Road, Patna- 14

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family

Welfare, 'Ayush' Deptt., Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of

Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy Unani, Sidha and Homeopathy (Ayush),

Government of India, New Delhi.

3. Under Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of

Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy

(Ayush), Govt. of India, New Delhi- 1

4. The Central Council of Homeopathy, through its Secretary, Jawaharlal

Nehru Bhartiya Siksha Avum Homeopathy Anusandhan Area, Opposite D-

Block, Janakpuri, New Delhi- 58

5. The Secretary, Central Council of Homeopathy, Jawaharlal Nehru

Bhartiya Shiksha Ayush Homeopathy Anusandhan Area, Opp. D-Block,

Janakpuri, New Delhi- 58.

6. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Department of Health, Medical

Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7. Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare,

Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

8. Director (Indigenous Medicine), Department of Health, Medical

Education and Family Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

9. Deputy Director (Indigenous Medicine), Department Of Health, Medical

Education and Family Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

10. B.R.A., Bihar University through its Vice Chancellor at Muzaffarpur.

11. Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University at Muzaffarpur

12. Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University at Muzaffarpur

13. Dr. Ramjee Singh, Teacher, Department of Materia Medica, Bihar

Homeopathic Medical College And Hospital, Gola Road, Patna And

Secretary G.D. Memorial Homeopathy Medical College And Hospital, Ram

Krishna Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna- 20

14. Dr. Mridul Kumar Sahni, Teacher, Department of Organan, Bihar

Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Gola Road, Patna, Resident of

Shivpuri, Tarany Press, P.S. S.K. Puri, Patna

.... .... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha

Patna High Court CWJC No.8657 of 2013 (3) dt.06-05-2014

2 / 2

2

For the Respondent State: Mr. Maruth Nath Roy

Mr. S K Mallick, AC to SC 25.

For respondent Nos.3&4: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI

ORAL ORDER

3

06-05-2014

Heard counsel for the parties.

Even according to the petitioner, he is a dismissed Principal

of the College in question. He can not represent the College in

absence of due authority by the Managing Committee to pursue

such litigation.

Even for argument sake, if the petitioner was the Principal

functioning as such of the institution, there could be an occasion to

consider the matter but a person whose status itself is under cloud

for which he is litigating before this Court and an LPA is pending,

this Court is not bound to adjudicate the dispute raised in the

present writ application at this juncture.

Writ application is dismissed.

R.K.Pathak/-

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top