PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
SIKANDAR KUMAR SAHNI @ SIKINDRA SAHNI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./60889/2022
BAIL - ILLEGAL LIQUOR - MANUFACTURING AND PACKING - NO RECOVERY FROM PETITIONER - BAIL GRANTED
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with a case registered for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 414, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)/33 of the Bihar Prohibition Act and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and other co-accused were manufacturing illicit liquor from spirit and packing the same in bottles. A raid was conducted on the house of co-accused Mahichand Sahni and his co-accused son Arvind Kumar was apprehended from the spot when he tried to flee away. From the house of the apprehended co-accused recovery of 107.20 litres of India made foreign liquor and 60 litres of spirit were made. Further recovery of 54 litres of India made foreign liquor was also made from a vehicle parked in the house of the co-accused. Stickers and other articles used in manufacturing and packing of the illicit liquor were also recovered from the spot.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery was shown from him. The court also considered the period of custody of the petitioner and the submission of charge-sheet against him.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in the absence of recovery from him and considering the period of custody and submission of charge-sheet.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the absence of recovery from him, the period of custody, and the submission of charge-sheet.
Final Decision: The court directed the petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Muzaffarpur.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60889 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2021 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni S/O Ram Babu Sahani Resident of
Village- Dahrpur, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2
04-01-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in
connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 61 of 2021 registered for
the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 414, 120(B) and
34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)/33 of the Bihar
Prohibition Act and Excise Act.
As per prosecution case, police received secret
information about petitioner and other co-accused persons
manufacturing illicit liquor from spirit and packing the same in
bottles. A raid was conducted on the house of co-accused
Mahichand Sahni and his co-accused son Arvind Kumar was
apprehended from the spot when he tried to flee away. From the
house of the apprehended co-accused recovery of 107.20 litres
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60889 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023
2/3
of India made foreign liquor and 60 litres of spirit were made.
Further recovery of 54 litres of India made foreign liquor was
also made from a vehicle parked in the house of the co-accused.
Stickers and other articles used in manufacturing and packing of
the illicit liquor were also recovered from the spot.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing
incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession.
The petitioner has been named in this case on the basis of
statement of co-accused, but the said statement has got no legal
sanctity and naming this petitioner on the basis of secret
information is merely high-handedness of the police. Learned
counsel further submits that recovery has been made from the
possession of the co-accused persons and no recovery has been
made from this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since
23.06.2022 and charge sheet has been submitted.
Learned APP vehemently opposes the submissions
made on behalf of the petitioners. Learned APP submits that
petitioner has got long criminal history and is accused in a large
number of cases of similar nature.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60889 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023
3/3
fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and
no recovery has been shown from him and further considering
the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge-
sheet against him, the petitioner above named is directed to be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1,
Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 61 of
2021, subject to the following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of
the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and
every date fixed by the court below.
(iii) In case of absence for three consecutive dates
or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail
bond of the petitioner will be liable to be
cancelled by the court concerned.
himanshu/-
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.