SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
UPENDRA RAM and ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS – Respondent
CR. REV. 892/2008



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.892 of 2008

======================================================

1. Upendra Ram

2. Mahaendra Ram, both sons of Bim Lal Ram, resident of Village

Sonapur, Police Station Jalalgarh, District Purnia

3. Sahabir Ram, son of late Jaggu Ram, resident of Village Gerial, Police

Station Jalalgarh, District Puria

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Md. Izhar, son of late Khalil

3. Moijuddin, son of Abdul Rahman

4. Md. Akhtar, son of Safedul

5. Md. Bushu, son of Sk. Ishaque

6. Md. Israil, son of Md. Shamser

7. Md. Yunus, son of late Abdul

8. Md. Shamser, son of late Abdul

9. Md. Jalil, son of Musab Ali

10. Md. Nayeem, son of late Jakir

11. Md. Naseem, son of late Jakir

12. Md. Naseem, son of late Jakir

13. Md. Yusuf, son of late Latif

14. Abdul Rauf, son of Safedul

15. Md. Shamim, son of Kalimuddin

16. Md. Mustafa, son of Kalimuddin

All residents of Village Adhang, Police Station Jalalgarh, District Purnia

.... .... Opposite party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite party/s : Mr.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA

ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.892 of 2008 (4) dt.19-12-2012

2 / 2

2

4 19-12-2012

It appears that due to non-compliance of the

peremptory order dated 16.12.2010, the present revision

application stood rejected against opposite party nos. 2 to 16.

Though almost two years have elapsed, but no steps have been

taken by the petitioners for restoration of the present revision

application against the contesting opposite party nos. 2 to 16.

Hence, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter

pending only against the State of Bihar (opposite party no.1),as it

has become incompetent.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the revision

application stands finally rejected.

Let this order be communicated to the learned court

below, without any unnecessary delay.

Kanth/-

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top