HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
SATYENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./69986/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64642 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya
======================================================
MANOJ YADAV Son of Birju Yadav Resident of Village - Dadpur, P.S.-
Magadh University, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69986 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya
======================================================
1.
SATYENDRA YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali R/o Village- Dadpur,
P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya.
2.
VIKASH YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali Resident of Village- Dadpur,
P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 64642 of 2021)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69986 of 2021)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
3
13-05-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video
conferencing.
The three petitioners in the two applications have
prayed for grant of regular bail in connection with Magadh
University P.S. Case no. 20 of 2021 registered under sections
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64642 of 2021(3) dt.13-05-2022
2/3
307, 147, 148, 149, 448 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and
section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, it is stated that on
reaching near the place of occurrence the ten named accused
persons including the three petitioners herein resorted to
indiscriminate firing on the informant. On an attempt by the
informant to escape, it is stated that the accused persons chased
them. The informant some how managed to escape unhurt. It is
further stated that the accused said that the informant should
vacate the land or else the entire family would be killed.
It is submitted by learned counsels for the petitioners
that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case.
Parties happen to be gotias and the cause of dispute which
would be evident from the FIR itself is land dispute between
the parties. No person was injured. The petitioners are in
custody since 10.8.2021, 10.9.2021 and 10.9.2021 respectively.
Investigation in the case has concluded.
Heard learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
taking into consideration the facts of the case, the nature of
allegations, no person having been injured in the occurrence
together with chargesheet having been submitted in the case, all
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64642 of 2021(3) dt.13-05-2022
3/3
the three petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in
connection with Magadh University P.S. Case no. 20 of 2021 on
each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya.
Spd/-
(Partha Sarthy, J)
U
T