SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
SATYENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./69986/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64642 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya

======================================================

MANOJ YADAV Son of Birju Yadav Resident of Village - Dadpur, P.S.-

Magadh University, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

with

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69986 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya

======================================================

1.

SATYENDRA YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali R/o Village- Dadpur,

P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya.

2.

VIKASH YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijali Resident of Village- Dadpur,

P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 64642 of 2021)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69986 of 2021)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

ORAL ORDER

3

13-05-2022

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video

conferencing.

The three petitioners in the two applications have

prayed for grant of regular bail in connection with Magadh

University P.S. Case no. 20 of 2021 registered under sections

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64642 of 2021(3) dt.13-05-2022

2/3

307, 147, 148, 149, 448 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and

section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that on

reaching near the place of occurrence the ten named accused

persons including the three petitioners herein resorted to

indiscriminate firing on the informant. On an attempt by the

informant to escape, it is stated that the accused persons chased

them. The informant some how managed to escape unhurt. It is

further stated that the accused said that the informant should

vacate the land or else the entire family would be killed.

It is submitted by learned counsels for the petitioners

that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case.

Parties happen to be gotias and the cause of dispute which

would be evident from the FIR itself is land dispute between

the parties. No person was injured. The petitioners are in

custody since 10.8.2021, 10.9.2021 and 10.9.2021 respectively.

Investigation in the case has concluded.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the facts of the case, the nature of

allegations, no person having been injured in the occurrence

together with chargesheet having been submitted in the case, all

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64642 of 2021(3) dt.13-05-2022

3/3

the three petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in

connection with Magadh University P.S. Case no. 20 of 2021 on

each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya.

Spd/-

(Partha Sarthy, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top