PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
SUNIL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./70870/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70870 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2020 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda
======================================================
Sunil Yadav, Son of Balak Yadav @ Rambalak Yadav R/o- Village -
Asthawan, P.S. - Asthawan, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Shambhu Narayan Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2
25-05-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the
complete start of the physical Court in normal course.
The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection
with Ashthawan P.S. Case No.226/2020 instituted under
Sections 341, 323, 325, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27
of the Arms Act.
The allegation in the FIR is that due to construction of
toilet on the Government road, there was dispute between the
informant’s side and the accused persons whereafter upon the
order given by the petitioner herein, accused Gorelal Yadav
opened fire which hit the ear of the informant’s husband who
fell down on the ground and became unconscious.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is
case and counter case in the matter for the same occurrence and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70870 of 2021(2) dt.25-05-2022
2/3
even taking the allegation as stated in FIR, it has been
specifically stated that accused Gorelal Yadav opened fire which
hit the ear of the informant’s husband. He further submits that
the said Gorelal Yadav is in jail and for the release of same, Cr.
Misc. No.26420/2022 has been preferred. He submits that his
role has been attributed in the FIR as that of an order giver for
which he has remained in jail since 27.07.2021 (as stated in
para-11 of the bail application). He lastly submits that he has no
criminal antecedent.
Considering the fact that specific allegation has been
made against accused Gorelal Yadav of having opened fire
which hit the ear of the informant’s husband, who according to
learned counsel for the petitioner is in jail, he has no criminal
antecedent and is in jail since 27.07.2021, this Court is inclined
to grant him privilege of bail.
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ashthawan
P.S. Case No.226/2020 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Magistrate,Ist Class, Nalanda/sucessor court, subject to
following conditions:
(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70870 of 2021(2) dt.25-05-2022
3/3
the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show
his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date
before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive
dates without plausible reasons will entail cancellation of his
bail by the Trial court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or
promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence,
failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for
cancellation of his bail bonds;
With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is
allowed.
Prakash Narayan /-
(Rajiv Roy, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.