SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma
JAY RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./71342/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71342 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2021 Thana- SALAIYA District- Aurangabad

======================================================

JAY RAM SINGH S/o Jagranath Singh R/o village- Terariya, P.S.- Salaiya,

District- Aurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar,

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Samir Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

ORAL ORDER

2

10-05-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Salaiya

P.S. Case No. 50 of 2021 registered under Sections 379, 413,

414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

is in custody since 23.09.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted

in the case and has antecedent of three cases in which he has

been acquitted in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 230 of 2012, though

at Para 3 it has been inadvertently typed that he has been

acquitted in Aurangabad Session Case No. 918 of 2017. It is

further submitted that informant alleges that one stolen

motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner

who disclosed that he had purchased the motorcycle from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71342 of 2021(2) dt.10-05-2022

2/2

Rajesh and Sushil. Further, from Rajesh and Sushil also

motorcycles were recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

has been falsely implicated in the present case, he was

completely unaware the purchased motorcycle is stolen one.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody

since 23.09.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case

and taking into consideration the submissions made by learned

counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named is

directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

the case is pending/successor court in connection with Salaiya

P.S. Case No. 50 of 2021, with a condition that one of the

bailors shall be the father of the petitioner namely, Jagannath

Singh.

ved/-

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top