SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Sonelal Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 17262/2019



Advocates:
['Anil Chandra', '', 'AMIT KUMAR', 'ARVIND UJJWAL SC']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17262 of 2019

======================================================

Sonelal Sah, Son of Choudhary Sah, Resident of Village- Rampatti Paktola,

Panchayat- Majhuliya, Block and P.S.- Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer

Protection Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

3.

The District Supply Officer, Sitamarhi.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer cum Licensing Authority, Sitamarhi Sadar,

District- Sitamarhi.

5.

The Block Supply Officer, Block- Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

6.

The Block Supply Officer, Block- Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Anil Chandra

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (Sc4)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR

MISHRA

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 18-02-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel appearing for the State.

2. This writ application, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, has been preferred against the order dated

22.07.2019 passed in Supply Appeal Case No. 06 of 2019 by the

Collector, Sitamarhi, (respondent no.2), dismissing the aforesaid

appeal of the petitioner affirming the order dated 18.07.2018, by

which, P.D.S. shop License No. 27 of 2017 of the petitioner was

cancelled by the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Licensing Authority,

Sadar, Sitamarhi.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17262 of 2019 dt.18-02-2021

2/2

3. The impugned appellate order is revisionable, under

Rule 32(V) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System

(Control) Order, 2016, accordingly, the writ petition, filed on

behalf of the petitioner, is dismissed with liberty to prefer the

revision, under Rule 32(V) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, within six weeks

before the appropriate forum and the same shall be disposed of

within a period of two months from the date of filing of revision

with copy of this order.

Bhardwaj/-

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

AFR/NAFR

NAFR

CAV DATE

Uploading Date

20.02.2021

Transmission Date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top