SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
LOKO YADAV @ LOKNATH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 65265/2019



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65265 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui

======================================================

Loko Yadav @ Loknath Yadav Son of Late Maha Yadav @ Mahadev Yadav

Resident of Village - Tarbadiya, P.S.- Chandramandih, dist.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

with

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56615 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui

======================================================

1.

Dashrath Yadav @ Dasho Yadav Son of Late Mahadev Yadav @ Maha

Yadav Resident of Village- Tarbadiya, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui

2.

Loko Yadav Son of Late Mahadev Yadav @ Maha Yadav Resident of

Village- Tarbadiya, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui

3.

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Yadav S/o Dashrath Yadav @ Dasho Yadav

Resident of Village- Tarbadiya, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui

4.

Sanjay Yadav S/o Dashrath Yadav @ Dasho Yadav Resident of Village-

Tarbadiya, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65265 of 2019)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Prakash Mahto, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. K.Kishore(App100)

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56615 of 2019)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

ORAL ORDER

13

26-09-2022

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks

from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65265 of 2019(13) dt.26-09-2022

2/6

A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.

65265 of 2019, submits that after inquiry made by the Registrar

General of the Patna High Court, it has been held that the

petitioner and pairwikar of the petitioner are responsible for

concealing of facts before this Hon’ble Court and thereafter vide

order dated 29.07.2022, Hon’ble Single Judge has passed the

following order “considering the aforesaid finding of the inquiry

report, this court deems it appropriate to impose a cost of Rs.

10,000/- each to the petitioner namely, Loko Yadav and Loknath

and his son Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Yadav which would

be deposited in Legal Aide Committee within 2 weeks from

today, on deposition of the same, this matter would be pleaded

under the appropriate heading for final adjudication no. of the

bail application. List this case on 18.08.2022 under the

appropriate heading.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that in compliance of the above said order, he has deposited total

Rs. 20,000/- before Patna High Court Legal Services Committee

on 02.08.2022. As such the order has been fully complied.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that

in the earlier Cr. Misc. no. 56615 of 2019, the present petitioner

is petitioner No. 2 and in this view of the matter, the only option

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65265 of 2019(13) dt.26-09-2022

3/6

left for him to withdrawn the petition filed by him. As such the

permission is granted. Let the Cr. Misc. No. 65265 of 2019 is

hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the petitioner Dr. Alok Kumar

Alok in Cr. Misc. No. 56615 of 2019, he is ready to argue his

bail petition which is for 4 petitioners, namely P1, P2, P3 & P4.

Prior to argument the case on merit, Learned counsel

for the petitioner submits that petitioner no. 1 Dashrath Yadav

died during pendency of the bail application as such the

application for Dashrath Yadav become infructuous and

presently, this bail application is maintenable only for 3

petitioners, namely P2, P3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top